Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

A.Punitha Ruby Vs R.Prince Arockiaraj,

A.Punitha Ruby vs R.Prince Arockiaraj,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 27, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1606166

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CONT P(MD)/1240/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A.Punitha Ruby

Respondent

R.Prince Arockiaraj,

Excerpt

before the madurai bench of madras high court dated : 27.02.2026coram :the hon`ble mr.justice b.pugalendhi a.punitha ruby ... petitioner vs. r.prince arockiaraj, ramanathapuram district. ... respondent prayer : contempt petition filed under section 11 of the contempt of courts act, 1971, to punish the contemnor / second respondent herein for the deliberate and wilful disobedience of the order dated 10.07.2024 passed by this court in wp.(md)no.15312 of 2024. for petitioner : mr.h.jasima yasmin, for m/s.ajmal associates. for respondent : mr.s.vinodh, government advocate.orderthe petitioner has approached this court that the order of this court in wp.(md)no.15312 of 2024 dated 10.07.2024, has not been complied with. 2.today, the learned counsel on either side inform the court that the order passed by this court has been complied with. 3.recording the same, this contempt petition is closed. ncc : yes/no index : yes/no internet:yes gns to ramanathapuram district. b.pugalendhi,j gns

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.02.2026

CORAM :

THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI A.Punitha ruby ... Petitioner Vs. R.Prince Arockiaraj, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondent Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the contemnor / second respondent herein for the deliberate and wilful disobedience of the order dated 10.07.2024 passed by this Court in WP.(MD)No.15312 of 2024. For Petitioner : Mr.H.Jasima Yasmin, for M/s.Ajmal Associates. For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinodh, Government Advocate.

ORDER

The petitioner has approached this Court that the order of this Court in WP.(MD)No.15312 of 2024 dated 10.07.2024, has not been complied with. 2.Today, the learned counsel on either side inform the Court that the order passed by this Court has been complied with. 3.Recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed. NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes gns To Ramanathapuram District. B.PUGALENDHI,J gns

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties A.Punitha Ruby vs R.Prince Arockiaraj, Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales