Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Althaf vs State of Kerala

Althaf vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 31, 2021
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1606132

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./1799/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Althaf

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....no.371/2021 of varkala police station registered for the offences punishable under sections 406 and 420 of the indian penal code.2. the petitioner has been in custody since 08.02.2021.3. the prosecution allegation is that the petitioner and the defacto complainant are friends. he got acquaintance with her through 'instagram'. he then with the intention to cheat the defacto complainant, received 6 sovereigns of gold ornaments from her and also her atm card. then he dishonestly withdrew an amount of rs.15,000 from her account and thereby committed the aforesaid offences.4. the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit thatthe petitioner is a young boy aged only 21 years. he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. but in fact, the defacto complainant has handed over her gold ornaments so as to pledge the same and collected money for her to purchase luxurious items such as camera, costly dress and other things. but he has never received her gold ornaments with the intention to cheat her. but he is undergoing incarceration for the last more than 50 days, hence this application.5. according to the learned public prosecutor the gold ornaments were received by him with the intention to cheat thedefacto complainant and hence recovery had been effected subsequently from a shop, where he had sold the gold ornaments. now the investigation of the case is well in progress.6. considering the period of detention undergone by the petitioner in custody as well the present stage of the investigation, i am inclined to release him on bail subject to the following conditions:(i) the petitioner shall be released on bail on hisexecuting a bond for a sum of rs.1,00,000/- (rupees one lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction.(ii) the petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer for interrogation as and when required by him, in writing.(iii) the petitioner shall not.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHIRCY V. WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 10TH CHAITHRA, 1943 CRIME NO.371/2021 OF VARKALA POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PETITIONER/ACCUSED: ALTHAF AGED 20 YEARS SON OF AJAIB KALPAKAM VEEDU PATTANTE THEIR KAYALPURAM AYROOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN-695310 BY ADV. SRI.P.N.SUKUMARAN RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA , ERNAKULAM-682031 2 SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VARKALA POLICE STATION , THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN- 695141 SRI. C. N. PRABHAKARAN, SR.PP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Dated this the 31st day of March 2021 Application for regular bail. The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.371/2021 of Varkala Police Station registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The petitioner has been in custody since 08.02.2021.

3. The prosecution allegation is that the petitioner and the defacto complainant are friends. He got acquaintance with her through 'Instagram'. He then with the intention to cheat the defacto complainant, received 6 sovereigns of gold ornaments from her and also her ATM card. Then he dishonestly withdrew an amount of Rs.15,000 from her account and thereby committed the aforesaid offences.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that

the petitioner is a young boy aged only 21 years. He has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. But in fact, the defacto complainant has handed over her gold ornaments so as to pledge the same and collected money for her to purchase luxurious items such as camera, costly dress and other things. But he has never received her gold ornaments with the intention to cheat her. But he is undergoing incarceration for the last more than 50 days, hence this application.

5. According to the learned Public Prosecutor the gold ornaments were received by him with the intention to cheat the

defacto complainant and hence recovery had been effected subsequently from a shop, where he had sold the gold ornaments. Now the investigation of the case is well in progress.

6. Considering the period of detention undergone by the petitioner in custody as well the present stage of the investigation, I am inclined to release him on bail subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall be released on bail on his

executing a bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction.

(ii) The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation as and when required by him, in writing.

(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly, make

any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

(iv) The petitioner shall not commit any offence while

on bail. In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the law. Sd/- SHIRCY V. JUDGE mpm

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial