The Divisional Controller vs Rajesab S/O. Lalsab Murnal,

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Aug 29, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1604669

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1604669
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: C.M. Poonacha
Decided On: Aug 29, 2025
Case Number: WP/63736/2012

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Divisional Controller

Respondent

Rajesab S/O. Lalsab Murnal,

Excerpt

.....to dismiss the kid no.36/2011 filed by the respondent on the file of presiding officer labour court bijapur, the copy of the same is at annexure-e to the writ petition in the interest of justice and equity; issue a writ in thenature of certiorari there by quashing the orderdated 03.09.2011 passed by the district judge and presiding officer labour court bijapur in kid -2- no.36/2011 issue no.i and consequently be pleased to hold that the de conducted by the petitioner corporation is fair and proper the copy of the same is at annexure-d to the writ petition in the interest of justice and equity. this petition, coming on for preliminary hearing in ‘b’ group, this day, the order was made therein as under: coram: the hon'ble mr. justice c.m. poonachaoral orderlearned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition, which reads as under: “memo for withdrawal1. that the petitioner is the divisional controller, which is pending before this court.2. that for certain the party want to settle the matter out of court.3. that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the instant case wp 63736/2012. kindly accept this memo. date: 29.08.2025 sd/- place:dharwad advocate for petitioner veena hegde” -3-2. memo is taken on record.3. in view of the memo, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.4. in view of disposal of the petition, pendinginterlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and are disposed of accordingly. sd/- (c.m. poonacha) judge yan ct-mck list no.: 1 sl no.: 38

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO. 63736 OF 2012 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN: THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, NWKRTC, BAGALKOT DIVISION, BAGALKOT, THE PETITIONER IS REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER, NWKRTC CENTRAL OFFICE, HUBLI. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. VEENA HEGDE, ADVOCATE) AND: RAJESAB S/O. LALSAB MURNAL, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC: NIL, R/O. NEERALAKERI, TQ: BAGALKOT, DIST: BAGALKOT. …RESPONDENT

NARAYANKAR (NOTICE TO RESPONDENT IS SERVED) Digitally signed by NARAYANKAR THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF Location: HIGHCOURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING, 1950 ISSUE A WRIT IN DHARWAD

THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI THERE BY QUASHING THE AWARD DATED 02.12.2011 PASSED BY THE DISTRICT JUDGE AND PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT, BIJAPUR IN KID NO.36/2011 AND CONSEQUENTLY BE PLEASED TO DISMISS THE KID NO.36/2011 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT ON THE FILE OF PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT BIJAPUR, THE COPY OF THE SAME IS AT ANNEXURE-E TO THE WRIT PETITION IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY; ISSUE A WRIT IN THE

NATURE OF CERTIORARI THERE BY QUASHING THE ORDER

DATED 03.09.2011 PASSED BY THE DISTRICT JUDGE AND PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT BIJAPUR IN KID -2- NO.36/2011 ISSUE NO.I AND CONSEQUENTLY BE PLEASED TO HOLD THAT THE DE CONDUCTED BY THE PETITIONER CORPORATION IS FAIR AND PROPER THE COPY OF THE SAME IS AT ANNEXURE-D TO THE WRIT PETITION IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA

ORAL ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition, which reads as under: “MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL

1. That the petitioner is the divisional controller, which is pending before this Court.

2. That for certain the party want to settle the matter out of Court.

3. That the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the instant case WP 63736/2012. Kindly accept this memo. Date: 29.08.2025 Sd/- Place:Dharwad Advocate for petitioner Veena Hegde” -3-

2. Memo is taken on record.

3. In view of the memo, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

4. In view of disposal of the petition, pending

interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and are disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE YAN CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 38

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties The Divisional Controller vs Rajesab S/O. Lalsab Murnal, Same Judge C.M. Poonacha