Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ayu-MIX Product vs Abida

Ayu-MIX Product vs ABIDA

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 15, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1602655

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RP/139/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ayu-MIX Product

Respondent

ABIDA

Excerpt

.....aged 54 years s/o. o. p. moideen, olapilakkal house, thirurangadi taluk, munniyoor village, p. o. munniyoor, pin - 676 311. 3 m/s machingal trading company chelari road, kodakkad, malappuram, rep. by managing director - abdul latheef, aged 54 years, s/o. o. p. moideen, olapilakkal house, munniyoor, pin - 676 311. this review petition having come up for admission on 15.02.2021, the court on the same day passed the following:sathish ninan, j.r. p. no.139 of 2021 in o. p. (c) no.1775 of 2020 dated this the 15th day of february, 2021orderthe original petition came up for admission on 19.01.2021 on which date while ordering urgentnotice to the respondents, i had granted an orderof stay of further proceedings pursuant to exts.p5order and p6 judgment for a period of one month.however, due to an oversight in the office, theorder of stay was not incorporated in the order.2. accordingly it is ordered that, the orderdated 19.01.2021 will contain a further direction as follows, “further proceedings pursuant to exts.p5 and p6 will remain stayed for a period of one month from 19.01.2021”. the review petition is allowed as above. sd/- sathish ninan judge kns/- //true copy// p.s. to judge rp.no.139 of 2021 in op(c). 1775/2020 appendix petitioner's exhibits: annexure a certified copy of the order dated 19.1.2021 in op(c) no.1775/2020.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 26TH MAGHA,1942 RP.No.139 OF 2021 IN OP(C). 1775/2020 (IN THE ORDRER DATED 19.01.2021 IN OP(C) 1775/2020) REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:

M/S AYU-MIX PRODUCT KOTHAPARAMBU DESOM, S. N. PURAM VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK, REP. BY PROPRIETOR RAHIM P. A., AGED 49 YEARS, S/O. PALLATH ALI, LOKAMALESWARAM VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK. BY ADVS. SRI.K.S.RAJESH SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1 ABIDA W/O. ABDUL LATHEEF, D/O. THAZHATHE PALLIYALIL, ABOOBAKCER, OTHUKUNGAL DESOM AND VILLAGE, THIRURANGADI TALUK, MUNNIYOOR VILLAGE, P. O. MUNNIYOOR, PIN - 676 311. 2 ABDUL LATHEEF AGED 54 YEARS S/O. O. P. MOIDEEN, OLAPILAKKAL HOUSE, THIRURANGADI TALUK, MUNNIYOOR VILLAGE, P. O. MUNNIYOOR, PIN - 676 311. 3 M/S MACHINGAL TRADING COMPANY CHELARI ROAD, KODAKKAD, MALAPPURAM, REP. BY MANAGING DIRECTOR - ABDUL LATHEEF, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O. O. P. MOIDEEN, OLAPILAKKAL HOUSE, MUNNIYOOR, PIN - 676 311. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

SATHISH NINAN, J.

R. P. No.139 of 2021 in O. P. (C) No.1775 of 2020 Dated this the 15th day of February, 2021

ORDER

The original petition came up for admission on 19.01.2021 on which date while ordering urgent

notice to the respondents, I had granted an order

of stay of further proceedings pursuant to Exts.P5

order and P6 judgment for a period of one month.

However, due to an oversight in the office, the

order of stay was not incorporated in the order.

2. Accordingly it is ordered that, the order

dated 19.01.2021 will contain a further direction as follows, “Further proceedings pursuant to Exts.P5 and P6 will remain stayed for a period of one month from 19.01.2021”. The review petition is allowed as above. Sd/- SATHISH NINAN JUDGE kns/- //True Copy// P.S. to Judge RP.No.139 OF 2021 IN OP(C). 1775/2020 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 19.1.2021 IN OP(C) NO.1775/2020.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial