The Management of Nwkrtc, vs Ramasidda S/O. Basavanni Wader

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Aug 29, 2025

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1601672

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1601672
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: C.M. Poonacha
Decided On: Aug 29, 2025
Case Number: WP/63461/2012

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Management of Nwkrtc,

Respondent

Ramasidda S/O. Basavanni Wader

Excerpt

.....officer, additional labour court, hubli the copy of the same is at annexure-d to the writ petition in the interest of justice and equity; issue a writ in the nature of certiorari whereby quashing the order dated 07/05/2011 on issue no.1 -2-whereby holding that the enquiry conducted by the enquiry officer as not fare and proper and consequently be pleased to hold that the same is in accordance with law and the copy of the same is produced as at annexure-c to the writ petition in the interest of justice and equity and etc. this petition, coming on for preliminary hearing in ‘b’ group, this day, the order was made therein as under: coram: the hon'ble mr. justice c.m. poonachaoral orderlearned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition, which reads as under: “memo for withdrawal1. that the petitioner is the management of nwkrtc, which is pending before this court.2. that for certain the party wants to settle the matter out of court.3. that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the instant wp 63461/2012.4. that this application for withdrawal is beingmade voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence from any party whatsoever. -3- prayer kindly accept this memo for withdrawal. date: 29.08.2025 sd/- place:dharwad advocate for petitioner veena hegde”2. memo is taken on record.3. in view of the memo, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.4. in view of disposal of the petition, pendinginterlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and are disposed of accordingly. sd/- (c.m. poonacha) judge yan ct-mck list no.: 1 sl no.: 37

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO. 63461 OF 2012 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN: THE MANAGEMENT OF NWKRTC, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, THE PETITIONER IS REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER, NWKRTC CENTRAL OFFICE, HUBLI. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. VEENA HEGDE, ADVOCATE) AND: RAMASIDDA S/O. BASAVANNI WADER, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC: NIL, R/O. TAVAG, TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELGAUM. NARAYANKAR …RESPONDENT Digitally signed by (RESPONDENT IS SERVED) NARAYANKAR Location: HIGHCOURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DHARWAD
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING, 1950 TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI THERE BY QUASHING THE AWARD DATED 13/06/2011 PASSED BY THE DISTRICT JUDGE AND PRESIDING OFFICER, ADDITIONAL LABOUR COURT, HUBLI IN KID NO.70/2010 AND CONSEQUENTLY BE PLEASED TO DISMISS THE KID NO.70/2010 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT ON THE FILE OF PRESIDING OFFICER, ADDITIONAL LABOUR COURT, HUBLI THE COPY OF THE SAME IS AT ANNEXURE-D TO THE WRIT PETITION IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY; ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI WHEREBY QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 07/05/2011 ON ISSUE NO.1 -2-
WHEREBY HOLDING THAT THE ENQUIRY CONDUCTED BY THE ENQUIRY OFFICER AS NOT FARE AND PROPER AND CONSEQUENTLY BE PLEASED TO HOLD THAT THE SAME IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND THE COPY OF THE SAME IS PRODUCED AS AT ANNEXURE-C TO THE WRIT PETITION IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA

ORAL ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition, which reads as under: “MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL

1. That the petitioner is the management of NWKRTC, which is pending before this Court.

2. That for certain the party wants to settle the matter out of Court.

3. That the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the instant WP 63461/2012.

4. That this application for withdrawal is being

made voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence from any party whatsoever. -3- PRAYER Kindly accept this memo for withdrawal. Date: 29.08.2025 Sd/- Place:Dharwad Advocate for petitioner Veena Hegde”

2. Memo is taken on record.

3. In view of the memo, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

4. In view of disposal of the petition, pending

interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and are disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE YAN CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties The Management of Nwkrtc, vs Ramasidda S/O. Basavanni Wader Same Judge C.M. Poonacha