Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ansar vs State of Kerala

ANSAR vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Feb 16, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1601034

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/633/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

ANSAR

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice v.g.arun tuesday, the 16th day of february 2021 / 27th magha,1942 crl.mc.no.633 of 2021(h) against the order/judgment in cc 694/2018 of judicial magistrate of first class , kodungallur crime no.304/2018 of valappad police station, thrissurpetitioner/accused: ansar aged 30 years s/o.abdul rahiman, puthanayil house, koorikuzhi desom, kaipamangalam village, mathilakam, thrissur. by adv. sri.e.vijin karthik respondents/state & defacto complainant: 1 state of kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam-682 031. 2 the sub inspector of police, valappad police station, valappad, thrissur-680 567. other present: sr.pp.c.s.hrithwik this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 16.02.2021, the court on the same day passed the following:orderdated this the 16th day of february 2021after arguing the matter for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the criminal m.c., with liberty to seek discharge before the trial court. in the nature of the contentions urged, it would be advisable for the petitioner to move for discharge rather than seeking to quash the proceedings under section 482 of the cr.p.c. accordingly, the criminal m.c. is dismissed, reserving the petitioner's liberty to move the trial court for discharge. sd/- v.g.arun judgenb appendix petitioner's exhibits: annexure a1 certified copy of the fir in crime no.304/2018 of valappad polcie station. annexure a2 true copy of the search list prepared by the police in crime no.304/2018 of valappad police station. annexure a3 certified copy of the final report in cc no.694/2018 on the files of the judicial first class magistrate court, kodungallur in crime no.304/2018 of valappad police station.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 27TH MAGHA,1942 Crl.MC.No.633 OF 2021(H) AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 694/2018 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS , KODUNGALLUR CRIME NO.304/2018 OF VALAPPAD POLICE STATION, THRISSUR

PETITIONER/ACCUSED: ANSAR AGED 30 YEARS S/O.ABDUL RAHIMAN, PUTHANAYIL HOUSE, KOORIKUZHI DESOM, KAIPAMANGALAM VILLAGE, MATHILAKAM, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.E.VIJIN KARTHIK RESPONDENTS/STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031. 2 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VALAPPAD POLICE STATION, VALAPPAD, THRISSUR-680 567. OTHER PRESENT: SR.PP.C.S.HRITHWIK THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Dated this the 16th day of February 2021

After arguing the matter for sometime, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Criminal M.C., with liberty to seek discharge before the trial court. In the nature of the contentions urged, it would be advisable for the petitioner to move for discharge rather than seeking to quash the proceedings under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. Accordingly, the Criminal M.C. is dismissed, reserving the petitioner's liberty to move the trial court for discharge. Sd/- V.G.ARUN JUDGE

NB APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.304/2018 OF VALAPPAD POLCIE STATION. ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF THE SEARCH LIST PREPARED BY THE POLICE IN CRIME NO.304/2018 OF VALAPPAD POLICE STATION. ANNEXURE A3 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CC NO.694/2018 ON THE FILES OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, KODUNGALLUR IN CRIME NO.304/2018 OF VALAPPAD POLICE STATION.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial