Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

The Branch Manager, Vs Arul

The Branch Manager, vs Arul

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jun 25, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1600950

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP(MD)/4157/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Branch Manager,

Respondent

Arul

Excerpt

c.m.p.(md) nos.4157 and 4159 of 2026 in c.m.a.(md)sr.nos.26214 and 26215 ofk.murali shankar,j.the above petitions have been filed seeking orders to condone the delay of 76 days in filing the appeals, challenging the award passed in m.c.o.p.nos.1 and 2 of 2024 dated 01.09.2025 on the file of the motor accident claims tribunal / subordinate court, ramanathapuram.2. despite receipt of notice, the respondents failed to enter into appearance.3. heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.4. considering the reasons assignedand taking note of the quantum of delay, this court is inclined to condone the delay. accordingly, these petitions are ordered and the registry is directed to number the appeals, if they are otherwise in order and list the same for admission in the usual course. 25.06.2026 csm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

C.M.P.(MD) Nos.4157 and 4159 of 2026 in C.M.A.(MD)SR.Nos.26214 and 26215 of

K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.

The above petitions have been filed seeking orders to condone the delay of 76 days in filing the appeals, challenging the award passed in M.C.O.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2024 dated 01.09.2025 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / Subordinate Court, Ramanathapuram.

2. Despite receipt of notice, the respondents failed to enter into appearance.

3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

4. Considering the reasons assigned

and taking note of the quantum of delay, this Court is inclined to condone the delay. Accordingly, these petitions are ordered and the Registry is directed to number the appeals, if they are otherwise in order and list the same for admission in the usual course. 25.06.2026 csm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties The Branch Manager, vs Arul Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice K.Murali Shankar

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales