Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mr.E.M.Najeeb vs the Assistant General Manager

Mr.E.M.Najeeb vs The Assistant General Manager

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Feb 17, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1600917

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/4142/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mr.E.M.Najeeb

Respondent

The Assistant General Manager

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable smt. justice p.v.asha wednesday, the 17th day of february 2021 / 28th magha,1942 name and address of the petitioners: 1 mr.e.m.najeeb aged 64 years s/o. illyas, 6d kowdiar manor, jawahar nagar, thiruvananthapuram 695 041. 2 mr. e. iqubal, aged 60 years s/o. mohammed, mullaserry house, sasthamvattom, trivandrum 690 305. 3 zaheer e.n., aged 55 years s/o. mohammed tc 4-1240, padiayth house, 66, rpd marg, kuravankonam, kowdiar (po), trivandrum 695 003. by adv. smt.liza p.cherian name and address of the respondent: the assistant general manager state bank of india, stressed asset resolution branch (sarb), 7th floor, vankarath tower, palarivattom, bypass junction, ernakulam 682 024. sri.m.jithesh menon,sc this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 17.02.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 17th day of february 2021 the learned standing counsel appearing for the bank points out that the proceedings are pending before the nclt.2. the learned counsel appearing for thepetitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. permission is granted. the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- p.v.asha judge dm appendix petitioner's exhibits: exhibit p1 the true copy of the demand notice issued to first petition dated 16.11.2020. exhibit p2 the true copy of the demand notice issued to second petitioner dated 17.11.2020 and typed copy.exhibit p3 the true copy of the demand notice issued to third petitioner dated 17.11.2020. exhibit p4 the true copy of the reply dated exhibit p5 the true copy of the ots letter issued by the respondent dated exhibit p6 the true copy of the paper publication dated 16/1/2021 (business line). respondents exhibits: nil //true copy// pa to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 28TH MAGHA,1942 NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE PETITIONERS: 1 MR.E.M.NAJEEB AGED 64 YEARS S/O. ILLYAS, 6D KOWDIAR MANOR, JAWAHAR NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 041. 2 MR. E. IQUBAL, AGED 60 YEARS S/O. MOHAMMED, MULLASERRY HOUSE, SASTHAMVATTOM, TRIVANDRUM 690 305. 3 ZAHEER E.N., AGED 55 YEARS S/O. MOHAMMED TC 4-1240, PADIAYTH HOUSE, 66, RPD MARG, KURAVANKONAM, KOWDIAR (PO), TRIVANDRUM 695 003. BY ADV. SMT.LIZA P.CHERIAN NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE RESPONDENT: THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA, STRESSED ASSET RESOLUTION BRANCH (SARB), 7TH FLOOR, VANKARATH TOWER, PALARIVATTOM, BYPASS JUNCTION, ERNAKULAM 682 024. SRI.M.JITHESH MENON,SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 17th day of February 2021 The learned Standing counsel appearing for the Bank points out that the proceedings are pending before the NCLT.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is granted. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- P.V.ASHA JUDGE DM APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED TO FIRST PETITION DATED 16.11.2020. EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED TO SECOND PETITIONER DATED 17.11.2020 AND TYPED COPY.

EXHIBIT P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED TO THIRD PETITIONER DATED 17.11.2020. EXHIBIT P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED EXHIBIT P5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE OTS LETTER ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED EXHIBIT P6 THE TRUE COPY OF THE PAPER PUBLICATION DATED 16/1/2021 (BUSINESS LINE). RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial