Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Karuthapandi Vs The District Collector

Karuthapandi vs The District Collector

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 30, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1600725

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(MD)/8576/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Karuthapandi

Respondent

The District Collector

Excerpt

before the madurai bench of madras high court dated : 30.03.2026coram:the honourable mr.sushrut arvind dharmadhikari, chief justice and the honourable mr.justice n.sathish kumar and karuthapandi ... petitioner -vs- 1.the district collector tenkasi 2.the revenue divisional officer sankarankovil 3.the tahsildar 4.the revenue inspector vasudevanallur 5.mutharasu ... respondentsprayer: petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the 3rd respondent in his impugned proceedings in no.nil dated 16.02.2026 and quash the same as illegal, without jurisdiction and further direct the 3rd respondent to consider the representation dated 13.10.2025 to issue patta within the stipulated time which this court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of this case.for petitioner : mr.m.jothi basu for respondents : mr.s.p.maharajan special government pleader for r1 to r4order[order of the court was made by the hon'ble chief justice] learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the case for sometime, seeks permission of this court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the appellate authority and work out his remedy in accordance with law.2. in view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [sushrut arvind dharmadhikari, c.j.] [n.sathish kumar, j.] ncc : yes / no index : yes / no krkto: 1.the district collector, tenkasi district, tenkasi. 2.the revenue divisional officer, sankarankovil, 3.the tahsildar, 4.the revenue inspector, vasudevanallur, the hon'ble chief justice andn.sathish kumar, j.krk and

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.03.2026

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR and Karuthapandi ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The District Collector Tenkasi 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Sankarankovil 3.The Tahsildar 4.The Revenue Inspector Vasudevanallur 5.Mutharasu ... Respondents

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the 3rd respondent in his impugned proceedings in No.NIL dated 16.02.2026 and quash the same as illegal, without jurisdiction and further direct the 3rd respondent to consider the representation dated 13.10.2025 to issue Patta within the stipulated time which this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of this case.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jothi Basu For Respondents : Mr.S.P.Maharajan Special Government Pleader for R1 to R4

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE] Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the case for sometime, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the appellate authority and work out his remedy in accordance with law.

2. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, C.J.] [N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.] NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No krk

To: 1.The District Collector, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sankarankovil, 3.The Tahsildar, 4.The Revenue Inspector, Vasudevanallur, THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

krk and

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial