Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ramesh. V vs State of Kerala

Ramesh. V vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jun 24, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1600547

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./1233/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramesh. V

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice k.haripal thursday, the 24th day of june 2021 / 3rd ashadha, 1943 bail appl. no. 1233 of 2021 crime no.758/2019 of cheranelloor police station, ernakulam district petitioner/accused: ramesh. v aged 45 years s/o.u.p.viswanthan ex. branch manager, state bank of india, ponekkara branch, cheranelloor,ernakulam, pin-683544 now residing at bansuri, dvra 12, 1st avenue, devine village, img junction, kakkanad., pin - 682030 c.p.udayabhanu sri.navaneeth.n.nath respondents: 1 state of kerala represented by the sub inspector of police, cheranelloor police station (crime no.758/2019)represented by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam ernakulam, pin - 682031 2 addl.r2 malliga.r aged 54 years w/o. balasubramaniyam, regional manager of state bank of india, ernakulam, harichandanam, kumaranelloor, perumbai, kottayam now residing at poorva grant bay flat, marine drive, ernakulam, pin .682 031. is impleaded as per order dated 15/02/2021 in crl.m.a. no. 1/2021. r2-sri.gilbert george correya sri. santhosh peter -sr.pp this bail application having come up for admission on 24.06.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: bail appl. no. 1233 of 2021 2orderthis is an application for anticipatory bail filed under section 438 of cr.p.c. after arguing for sometime, the learned counsel for the petitioner wanted to withdraw the application. the application is allowed to be withdrawn and it is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to move again. sd/- k.haripal judge lek

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARIPAL THURSDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2021 / 3RD ASHADHA, 1943 BAIL APPL. NO. 1233 OF 2021 CRIME NO.758/2019 OF CHERANELLOOR POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT PETITIONER/ACCUSED: RAMESH. V AGED 45 YEARS S/o.U.P.VISWANTHAN EX. BRANCH MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, PONEKKARA BRANCH, CHERANELLOOR,ERNAKULAM, PIN-683544 NOW RESIDING AT BANSURI, DVRA 12, 1ST AVENUE, DEVINE VILLAGE, IMG JUNCTION, KAKKANAD., PIN - 682030 C.P.UDAYABHANU SRI.NAVANEETH.N.NATH RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHERANELLOOR POLICE STATION (CRIME NO.758/2019)REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 2 ADDL.R2 MALLIGA.R AGED 54 YEARS W/O. BALASUBRAMANIYAM, REGIONAL MANAGER OF STATE BANK OF INDIA, ERNAKULAM, HARICHANDANAM, KUMARANELLOOR, PERUMBAI, KOTTAYAM NOW RESIDING AT POORVA GRANT BAY FLAT, MARINE DRIVE, ERNAKULAM, PIN .682 031. IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 15/02/2021 IN CRL.M.A. NO. 1/2021. R2-SRI.GILBERT GEORGE CORREYA SRI. SANTHOSH PETER -SR.PP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.06.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: BAIL APPL. NO. 1233 OF 2021 2

ORDER

This is an application for anticipatory bail filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. After arguing for sometime, the learned counsel for the petitioner wanted to withdraw the application. The application is allowed to be withdrawn and it is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to move again. Sd/- K.HARIPAL JUDGE LEK

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial