Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Murugeshwara Ventures Llp vs the Hotel and Restaurants Approval and Classification Committee (Hracc)

Murugeshwara Ventures Llp vs The Hotel and Restaurants Approval and Classification Committee (Hracc)

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 01, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1599708

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/2479/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Murugeshwara Ventures Llp

Respondent

The Hotel and Restaurants Approval and Classification Committee (Hracc)

Excerpt

.....salai, chennai- 600 002. 3 state of kerala represented by secretary, tourism department, govt. secretariat, thiruvananthapuram-695 001. r1-2 by smt.o.m.shalina, cgcsmt.princy xavier, gp this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 01.03.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 1st day of march 2021the petitioner firm has constructed a new hotel and had submitted an application for classification. though on the basis of ext.p1 application, an inspection was scheduled on 11.03.2020 and thereafter on 13.03.2020, inspection was not conducted. the writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents to expedite the inspection and to issue orders on classification.2. adv.smt.o.m.shalina, the learned cgc, submitted that the inspection is fixed by the team between 10.03.2021 and 14.03.2021 and the petitioner's hotel is also included in the same.3. therefore, the writ petition is disposed ofwith a direction to respondent nos.1 and 2 to complete the inspection and finalise the same including the issuance of orders on classification within a period of one month from the date of inspection. sd/- p.v.asha judge dm appendix petitioner's exhibits: exhibit p1 photocopy of the track application status. exhibit p2 photocopy of the letter dated 11.3.2020 issued by the ist exhibit p3 photocopy of the letter dated 12.3.2020 issued by the ist exhibit p4 photocopy of the letter dated 11.9.2020 sent to the ist respondent. respondents exhibits: nil //true copy// pa to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA MONDAY, THE 01ST DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 10TH PHALGUNA, 1942 PETITIONER: M/S.MURUGESHWARA VENTURES LLP (HOTEL SREE RAM), B.P. BUILDING, P.C. JUNCTION, MUKKAM, KOZHIKODE-673 602, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING/DESIGNATED PARTNER, JAMES JOSEPH, AGED 60 YEARS, S/O. CHACKO JOSEPH (LATE). BY ADVS. SRI.M.G.KARTHIKEYAN SRI.NIREESH MATHEW RESPONDENTS:

1 THE HOTEL AND RESTAURANTS APPROVAL AND CLASSIFICATION COMMITTEE (HRACC) MINISTRY OF TOURISM, C1-HUTMENTS, DALHOUSIE ROAD, NEW DELHI-110 011, REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY. 2 THE HOTEL AND RESTAURANTS APPROVAL AND CLASSIFICATION COMMITTEE (HRACC) (SOUTH) REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL DIRECTOR AND CONVENER, SOUTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE, 154, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI- 600 002. 3 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, TOURISM DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. R1-2 BY SMT.O.M.SHALINA, CGC

SMT.PRINCY XAVIER, GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 1st day of March 2021

The petitioner firm has constructed a new Hotel and had submitted an application for classification. Though on the basis of Ext.P1 application, an inspection was scheduled on 11.03.2020 and thereafter on 13.03.2020, inspection was not conducted. The writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents to expedite the inspection and to issue orders on classification.

2. Adv.Smt.O.M.Shalina, the learned CGC, submitted that the inspection is fixed by the team between 10.03.2021 and 14.03.2021 and the petitioner's Hotel is also included in the same.

3. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of

with a direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to complete the inspection and finalise the same including the issuance of orders on classification within a period of one month from the date of inspection. Sd/- P.V.ASHA JUDGE DM APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 PHOTOCOPY OF THE TRACK APPLICATION STATUS. EXHIBIT P2 PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER DATED 11.3.2020 ISSUED BY THE IST EXHIBIT P3 PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER DATED 12.3.2020 ISSUED BY THE IST EXHIBIT P4 PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER DATED 11.9.2020 SENT TO THE IST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial