Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Haneefa vs State of Kerala

Haneefa vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 29, 2021
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1598268

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./1110/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Haneefa

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....and he is still at large. the applicant was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 18.10.2020 and continues to be remand.3. the applicant states that he is innocent and the allegations are not true and that he has got nothing to do with the ganja which was allegedly recovered from the car and that he hasno criminal antecedents, he is willing to co- operate with the investigation, therefore he seeks regular bail since he has been in custody for a fairly long time.4. heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned public prosecutor.5. the applicant was caught red handed whilehe was involved in transporting ganja in a car and the first accused who was accompanying him managed to flee. the applicant was however apprehended and was remanded to judicial custody. the allegation that he had nothing to do with the car or the contraband articles are matters for evidence. in view of the fact that the applicant was caught redhanded with commercial quantity of ganja, the embargo under section 37(1)(b)(ii) of ndps act would squarely apply to this case and there are no reasonable grounds to believe that the applicant is not guilty nor is there reason to believe that the applicant may not get involved in offences of similar nature. hence, the application for bail is only to be dismissed. sd/- ashok menon judge spk

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 9TH MAGHA, 1942 CRIME NO.695/2020 OF Kondotty Police Station, Malappuram PETITIONER/S: HANEEFA AGED 25 YEARS THARAKAN HOUSE, VALAVANNUR, KANMANAM, THEKKUMMURI POST, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.SAHEERA RESPONDENT/S: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.V.SREEJA -PP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Dated this the 29th day of January 2021 Application for regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The applicant is the second accused in Crime No.695/2020 of Kondotty Police Station, Malappuram, for having allegedly committed offences punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)C and 29(i) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.

2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on

17.10.2020 at about 8.30 p.m, the applicant and the 1st accused were travelling in a RITZ Car bearing Reg.No.KL 71A 4786 and they were intercepted by the police at Kodanad and on search 25.50 Kgs of ganja was recovered. The first accused managed to flee and he is still at large. The applicant was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 18.10.2020 and continues to be remand.

3. The applicant states that he is innocent and the allegations are not true and that he has got nothing to do with the ganja which was allegedly recovered from the car and that he has

no criminal antecedents, he is willing to co- operate with the investigation, therefore he seeks regular bail since he has been in custody for a fairly long time.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned Public Prosecutor.

5. The applicant was caught red handed while

he was involved in transporting ganja in a car and the first accused who was accompanying him managed to flee. The applicant was however apprehended and was remanded to judicial custody. The allegation that he had nothing to do with the car or the contraband articles are matters for evidence. In view of the fact that the applicant was caught red

handed with commercial quantity of ganja, the embargo under Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of NDPS Act would squarely apply to this case and there are no reasonable grounds to believe that the applicant is not guilty nor is there reason to believe that the applicant may not get involved in offences of similar nature. Hence, the application for bail is only to be dismissed. Sd/- ASHOK MENON JUDGE SPK

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial