Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Manual, vs Gopinathan

Manual, vs Gopinathan

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Nov 29, 2021
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1597858

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP(C)/231/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manual,

Respondent

Gopinathan

Excerpt

.....court, despite service of notice, is also deliberate. having heard the learned counsel and having considered the report, the original petition is disposed of, directing the additional munsiff, cherthala to take up the pending execution applications in e.p.no.38 of 2017, onservice of notice on the legal representatives of the judgmentdebtor being completed. earnest efforts should thereafter be taken to pass final orders in the execution petition, if possible, within three months of completion of service. sd/- v.g.arun judge rk appendix of op(c) 231/2021 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 photocopy of the decree passed by the sub court in a.s. no. 91 of 2003. exhibit p2 photocopy of the warrant issued in e.p. no. 68/2012 in o.s. no. 512/90 on the file of the addl. munsiffs court, cherthala. exhibit p3 photocopy of the e.p. no. 38/2017 in o.s. no. 512/90 of th addl. munsiffs court, cherthala. exhibit p4 photocopy of the order dated 25.7.2019 in e.a. no. 79/2019 in e.p. no. 38/2017 in os 512/90. exhibit p5 photocopy of the e.a. no. 298/2019 in e.p. no. 38/2017 in os no. 512/90. exhibit p6 photocopy of counter affidavit filed to ext. p5. exhibit p7 photocopy of the order dated 7.12.2017 in ia no. 3155/2017 in os no. 536/2017. exhibit p8 photocopy of the judgment dated 23.3.2020 in cma no. 7/2018.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN MONDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 8TH AGRAHAYANA, 1943 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 512/1990 OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT,CHERTHALA PETITIONER/S/DECREE HOLDER IN E.P./PLAINTIFF IN O.S.: MANUAL, AGED 64 YEARS, S/O. JOSEPH, THYVELIKAKATHU HOUSE NO. EDAPPALLY SOUTH VILLAGE, KANAYANNORE TALUK, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI 682 032. BY ADVS. R.LAKSHMI NARAYAN SMT.R.RANJANIE RESPONDENT/S/JUDGMENT DEBTOR IN E.P./2ND DEFENDANT IN O.S.: 1 GOPINATHAN AGED 79 YEARS, S/O. MADHAVI, DHARAMAVILASOM, KONATTUSSERY, VETTACKAL DESOM, PATTANAKKAD VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT 688 531.

Addl.Resp. SARASWATHI AMMA 2 W/O GOPINATHAN, DHARAMAVILASOM, KONATTUSSERY, Addl.Resp. JAYATHILAKAN 3 s/O GOPINATHAN, DHARAMAVILASOM, KONATTUSSERY, Addl.Resp. LALITHADEVI 4 D/O GOPINATHAN, DHARAMAVILASOM, KONATTUSSERY, Addl.Resp. INDIRADEVI 5 D/O GOPINATHAN, DHARAMAVILASOM, KONATTUSSERY,

(ADDL.RESPONDENTS 2 TO 5 ARE IMPLEADED, AS PER ORDER

DATED 08.10.2021) THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 29th day of November, 2021 In a suit filed in the year 1990, a decree was passed on 29.10.2011. The decree holder filed execution petition in the year 2017, which is yet to be finalised. Hence, this original petition seeking expeditious disposal of the execution petition.

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that,

by the decree, a permanent prohibitory injunction is granted, restraining the defendant from encroaching upon plaint schedule property and also a mandatory injunction directing the defendant to dismantle the unauthorised construction

effected in the property. It is submitted that the judgment

and decree was challenged without success upto the second appeal stage. The petitioner filed E.P.No.68 of 2012 earlier and the decree got executed. Thereafter, defendant encroached into the decree schedule property, compelling the petitioner to file the second execution petition (E.P.No.38 of 2017).

3. In the report called for, learned Munsiff has stated

that the judgment debtor has filed an application under Section 47 of CPC contending that the decree does not provide for fixation of boundary or removal of portion of cattle shed from the decree schedule property. It is stated that the execution petition was being adjourned at the request of parties and the petition was not taken up after the onset of Covid-19 pandemic and resulting in restricted functioning of the court. Further, the judgment debtor died in the meanwhile and steps have been taken to implead his legal heirs.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that

even in this original petition, legal representatives of the deceased judgment debtor are made parties and though served with notice, they have not appeared. According to the learned Counsel, their non-appearance before the executing court, despite service of notice, is also deliberate. Having heard the learned Counsel and having considered the report, the Original Petition is disposed of, directing the Additional Munsiff, Cherthala to take up the pending execution applications in E.P.No.38 of 2017, on

service of notice on the legal representatives of the judgment

debtor being completed. Earnest efforts should thereafter be taken to pass final orders in the execution petition, if possible, within three months of completion of service. Sd/- V.G.ARUN JUDGE RK APPENDIX OF OP(C) 231/2021 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 PHOTOCOPY OF THE DECREE PASSED BY THE SUB COURT IN A.S. NO. 91 OF 2003. EXHIBIT P2 PHOTOCOPY OF THE WARRANT ISSUED IN E.P. NO. 68/2012 IN O.S. NO. 512/90 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. MUNSIFFS COURT, CHERTHALA. EXHIBIT P3 PHOTOCOPY OF THE E.P. NO. 38/2017 IN O.S. NO. 512/90 OF TH ADDL. MUNSIFFS COURT, CHERTHALA. EXHIBIT P4 PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER DATED 25.7.2019 IN E.A. NO. 79/2019 IN E.P. NO. 38/2017 IN OS 512/90. EXHIBIT P5 PHOTOCOPY OF THE E.A. NO. 298/2019 IN E.P. NO. 38/2017 IN OS NO. 512/90. EXHIBIT P6 PHOTOCOPY OF COUNTER AFFIDAVIT FILED TO EXT. P5. EXHIBIT P7 PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER DATED 7.12.2017 IN IA NO. 3155/2017 IN OS NO. 536/2017. EXHIBIT P8 PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 23.3.2020 IN CMA NO. 7/2018.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial