Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Santhosh Kumar vs State of Kerala

Santhosh Kumar vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Feb 25, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1596795

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.A/54/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Santhosh Kumar

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

crl.m.appl/2/2021 in crl.a 54/2021 1/1in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent: the honourable mr. justice b.sudheendra kumar thursday,the 18th day of march 2021/27th phalguna, 1942 crl.m.appl/2/2021 in crl.a/54/2021 crl.mc no.1175/2020 of the sessions court(special court for amended schedule castes and scheduled tribes (prrevention of atrocities) act, for information purpose only thodupuzha. appellant/accused no.1 santhosh kumar,aged 44 years s/o damodaran, gateingal house, thekkady kara, kumily village, idukki district-685 509. respondents/state/de-facto complainant1. state of kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam-682 031.2. rajani babu,aged 40 years w/o babu, kannikulangara veetil house, thotta purakkal baagham, thekkady kara, kumily village, idukki disrict-685 509. petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the high court be pleased to extend the time awarded by this court directing the appellant to surrender within 10 days by a week, in the interest of justice. this petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearingthe arguments of m/s jose pallattukaran, sanjana rachel jose, advocates for the petitioner and the public prosecutor for r1, and of m/s g.hariharan, k.s.smitha, praveen.h., shine varghese, v.r.sanjeev kumar, advocates r2, the court passed the followingorderfor the reasons stated in the application, the period fixed for the surrender by the appellant as per order dated 25.02.2021 stands extended by one week as prayed for. 18-03-2021 sd/- b.sudheendra kumar,judge /true copy/ sd/- assistant registrar

Full Judgment

Crl.M.Appl/2/2021 IN CRL.A 54/2021 1/1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Present: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR Thursday,the 18th day of March 2021/27th Phalguna, 1942 Crl.M.Appl/2/2021 IN CRL.A/54/2021 CRL.MC NO.1175/2020 OF THE SESSIONS COURT(SPECIAL COURT FOR AMENDED SCHEDULE CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES (PRREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, For information purpose only THODUPUZHA. APPELLANT/ACCUSED NO.1 SANTHOSH KUMAR,AGED 44 YEARS S/O DAMODARAN, GATEINGAL HOUSE, THEKKADY KARA, KUMILY VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685 509. RESPONDENTS/STATE/DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031.

2. RAJANI BABU,AGED 40 YEARS W/O BABU, KANNIKULANGARA VEETIL HOUSE, THOTTA PURAKKAL BAAGHAM, THEKKADY KARA, KUMILY VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISRICT-685 509. Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court be pleased to extend the time awarded by this court directing the appellant to surrender within 10 days by a week, in the interest of justice. This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing

the arguments of M/S JOSE PALLATTUKARAN, SANJANA RACHEL JOSE, Advocates for the petitioner and the PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for R1, and of M/S G.HARIHARAN, K.S.SMITHA, PRAVEEN.H., SHINE VARGHESE, V.R.SANJEEV KUMAR, Advocates R2, the court passed the following

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the application, the period fixed for the surrender by the appellant as per order dated 25.02.2021 stands extended by one week as prayed for. 18-03-2021 Sd/- B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR,JUDGE /true copy/ Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial