Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pratheesh vs Midha

Pratheesh vs MIDHA

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 31, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1596356

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP (FC)/46/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pratheesh

Respondent

MIDHA

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a.muhamed mustaque & the honourable dr. justice kauser edappagath wednesday, the 31st day of march 2021 / 10th chaithra, 1943 op (fc).no.46 of 2021 against the order dated 16.12.2019 in ia 2961/2016 in op 709/2016 of family court, irinjalakuda petitioner:pratheesh aged 38 years s/o. kulangara radhakrishnan, kulangara house, chentrappinni village, chentrappinni p.o, kodungallur taluk, pin 680 687 by advs. sri.biju martin sri.m.m.salim respondent: midha, aged 31 years d/o. vazhoor radhakrishnan, desom, chentrappinni p.o, koolimuttam village, kodungallur taluk pin 680 687 r1 by adv. sri.m.shaju purushothaman r1 by adv. sri.k.s.rajesh this op (family court) having been finally heard on 31.03.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 31st day of march 2021 a.muhamed mustaque, j pending this original petition, the dispute has been resolved through mediation. the mediation agreement is produced as ext.p4 along with i.a.no.1/2021. it is appropriate that the family court, irinjalakkuda dispose of the matter pending before the said court in terms of the mediation agreement by passing necessary decree, in the next posting itself. the o.p.(fc) is disposed of as above. a.muhamed mustaque judge dr. kauser edappagath kp true copy judge p.a. to judge appendix petitioner's exhibits: exhibit p1 true copy of the o.p no. 709/2016, family court, irinjalakuda dated 03-09-2016 exhibit p2 true copy of the objection filed by the respondent in o.p no. 709/2016 dated 23-09- exhibit p3 true copy of the i.a no. 2961 in o.p no exhibit p4 true copy of the mediation agreement dated 27.3.2021 executed between the parties in g.o.p 707/2016, family court, irunjalakkuda exhibit p5 true copy of the mediationn agreement dated 27.3.2021 executed betwwn the parties in op exhibit p6 true copy of the mediation agreement dated27.3.2021 entered between the petitioner pratheesh and.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 10TH CHAITHRA, 1943 OP (FC).No.46 OF 2021 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 16.12.2019 IN IA 2961/2016 IN OP 709/2016 OF FAMILY COURT, IRINJALAKUDA PETITIONER:

PRATHEESH AGED 38 YEARS S/O. KULANGARA RADHAKRISHNAN, KULANGARA HOUSE, CHENTRAPPINNI VILLAGE, CHENTRAPPINNI P.O, KODUNGALLUR TALUK, PIN 680 687 BY ADVS. SRI.BIJU MARTIN SRI.M.M.SALIM RESPONDENT: MIDHA, AGED 31 YEARS D/O. VAZHOOR RADHAKRISHNAN, DESOM, CHENTRAPPINNI P.O, KOOLIMUTTAM VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK PIN 680 687 R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.S.RAJESH THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 31st day of March 2021 A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J Pending this original petition, the dispute has been resolved through mediation. The mediation agreement is produced as Ext.P4 along with I.A.No.1/2021. It is appropriate that the Family Court, Irinjalakkuda dispose of the matter pending before the said court in terms of the mediation agreement by passing necessary decree, in the next posting itself. The O.P.(FC) is disposed of as above. A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH kp True copy JUDGE P.A. To Judge APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE O.P NO. 709/2016, FAMILY COURT, IRINJALAKUDA DATED 03-09-2016 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT IN O.P NO. 709/2016 DATED 23-09- EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE I.A NO. 2961 IN O.P NO EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE MEDIATION AGREEMENT DATED 27.3.2021 EXECUTED BETWEEN THE PARTIES IN G.O.P 707/2016, FAMILY COURT, IRUNJALAKKUDA EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE MEDIATIONN AGREEMENT DATED 27.3.2021 EXECUTED BETWWN THE PARTIES IN OP EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE MEDIATION AGREEMENT DATED

27.3.2021 ENTERED BETWEEN THE PETITIONER PRATHEESH AND RESPONDNET MIDHA, EXECUTED AND SUBMITTED THROUGH MEDIATION SUB CENTRE, IRINJALAKUDA

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial