John Mathew vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Aug 25, 2021

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1591580

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1591580
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice N.Nagaresh
Decided On: Aug 25, 2021
Case Number: WP(C)/470/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

John Mathew

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....same day delivered the following: :2 :judgmentdated this the 25th day of august, 2021 this writ petition was filed by the petitioner seeking to command respondents 2 and 3 to allow exts.p1 and p2 representations under section 6 of the kerala land utilisation order, 1967 without insisting for payment as stipulated under section 27a(3) of the kerala conservation of paddy land and wetland act, 2008.2. when this writ petition came up for hearing today,the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the learned government pleader has produced a memo which discloses that the application submitted by the petitioner stands rejected. now, the petitioner wants to challenge those orders and the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the writ petition without prejudice to his right to challenge the orders now issued. :3 : accordingly, granting such liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- n. nagaresh, judge aks/31.08.2021 :4 : appendix of wp(c) 470/2021 petitioner's exhibits: exhibit p1 true copy of the representation dated petitioner's property having 15 cents exhibit p2 true copy of the representation dated petitioner's property having 40 cents exhibit p3 true copy of the relevant page of thedate bank issued from the office of the agricultural field officer, muvattupuzha pertaining to 55 cents of property in sy.no.363/4a of marady village, muvattupuzha taluk.exhibit p4 true copy of the judgment dated exhibit p5 true copy of the report of the ksrec no a/172/2015/ksrec dated 12.02.2018. exhibit p6 true copy of the report no mvk-6/18-19 dated 01.06.2018 before the 2nd respondent revenue divisional officer, muvattupuzha. exhibit p7 a true copy of the receipt bearing no- l5/16977/2017 dated 29.6.2017 issued by receipt of ext. p1 representation exhibit p8 a true copy of the receipt bearing no- l5/16974/2017 dated 29.6.2017 issued by receipt of ext. p2 representation exhibit p9 true copy of judgment dated 11.2.2021 in wpc 517/2021. sr

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 3RD BHADRA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 470 OF 2021 PETITIONER: JOHN MATHEW, AGED 32 YEARS, S/O MATHEW GEORGE, KURUVITHADAM HOUSE, ARAKUZHA VILLAGE, PERUMBALLOOR, MUVATTUPUZHA P O.
BY ADVS. PEEYUS A.KOTTAM SHRI. HRITHWIK D. NAMBOOTHIRI RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682530. 3 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MUVATTUPUZHA-686661. BY ADV GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.VIPIN NARAYAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.08.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: :2 :

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 25th day of August, 2021 This writ petition was filed by the petitioner seeking to command respondents 2 and 3 to allow Exts.P1 and P2 representations under Section 6 of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967 without insisting for payment as stipulated under Section 27A(3) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008.

2. When this writ petition came up for hearing today,

the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the learned Government Pleader has produced a memo which discloses that the application submitted by the petitioner stands rejected. Now, the petitioner wants to challenge those orders and the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the writ petition without prejudice to his right to challenge the orders now issued. :3 : Accordingly, granting such liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- N. NAGARESH, JUDGE aks/31.08.2021 :4 : APPENDIX OF WP(C) 470/2021 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED PETITIONER'S PROPERTY HAVING 15 CENTS EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED PETITIONER'S PROPERTY HAVING 40 CENTS EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE

DATE BANK ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE AGRICULTURAL FIELD OFFICER, MUVATTUPUZHA PERTAINING TO 55 CENTS OF PROPERTY IN SY.NO.363/4A OF MARADY VILLAGE, MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE KSREC NO A/172/2015/KSREC DATED 12.02.2018. EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT NO MVK-6/18-19 DATED 01.06.2018 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MUVATTUPUZHA. EXHIBIT P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT BEARING NO- L5/16977/2017 DATED 29.6.2017 ISSUED BY RECEIPT OF EXT. P1 REPRESENTATION EXHIBIT P8 A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT BEARING NO- L5/16974/2017 DATED 29.6.2017 ISSUED BY RECEIPT OF EXT. P2 REPRESENTATION EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 11.2.2021 IN WPC 517/2021. SR

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2021 Same Parties John Mathew vs State of Kerala Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice N.Nagaresh