Jishnu vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 25, 2021

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1591306

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1591306
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice Ashok Menon
Decided On: Jan 25, 2021
Case Number: Bail Appl./211/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jishnu

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....vasco centre, perinjanam village, kaipamangalam, thrissur, pin- 680 686, pin-680686 respondent state of kerala, represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, pin-682031€ €€€application praying that in the circumstances stated therein the high court be pleased to correct the name of the petitioner as 'vishnu' instead of 'jishnu' in the order in b.a.211/2021, dated 25.01.20221, to secure the ends of justice. € €€€this application coming on for orders upon perusing the application€and this court's •nal order dated 25.1.2021 in b.a.no.211/2021 upon hearing the arguments of m/s. d.vimal dev & snehaprabha, advocates for the petitioner and the public prosecutor for the respondent, the court passed the following: € €€€€€€€€€€ € € p.t.o € mkm€ashok menon, j.------------------------------------ crl.ma no.2/2021 in ba no.211/2021 ------------------------------------- for information purpose dated this the 19 dayth only of march, 2021orderthe applicant has filed this application to correct the name of the applicant/accused as 'vishnu' instead of 'jishnu', which is mistakenly crept in the application as well as in the order, which was passed by this court.2. heard the learned counsel for the applicant and thelearned public prosecutor. the learned public prosecutor admits that there is a mistake in the name of the applicant/accused and the actual name of he applicant/accused is 'vishnu'. hence, the correction petition is allowed. registry is directed to carry out the correction in the application as also in the consequent order passed by this court. sd/- ashok menon judge jg /true copy/ sd/- assistant registrar

Full Judgment

Crl.M.Appl/2/2021 IN Bail Appl. 211/2021 1/2 €
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Present: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON Friday,the 19th day of March 2021/28th Phalguna, 1942 Crl.M.Appl/2/2021 IN Bail Appl./211/2021 CRIME NO.879/2020 OF KAIPAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, THRISSUR . € For information purpose only PETITIONER VISHNU,AGED 29 YEARS, KUNNUNGAPARAMBIL HOUSE, VASCO CENTRE, PERINJANAM VILLAGE, KAIPAMANGALAM, THRISSUR, PIN- 680 686, PIN-680686 RESPONDENT STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN-682031

€ €€€Application praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court be pleased to correct the name of the petitioner as 'Vishnu' instead of 'Jishnu' in the order in B.A.211/2021, dated 25.01.20221, to secure the ends of justice. € €€€This application coming on for orders upon perusing the application€and this court's •nal order dated 25.1.2021 in B.A.No.211/2021 upon hearing the arguments of M/S. D.VIMAL DEV & SNEHAPRABHA, Advocates for the petitioner and the PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the respondent, the court passed the following: € €€€€€€€€€€ € € p.t.o € mkm€

ASHOK MENON, J.

------------------------------------ Crl.MA No.2/2021 in BA No.211/2021 ------------------------------------- For information purpose Dated this the 19 dayth only of March, 2021

ORDER

The applicant has filed this application to correct the name of the applicant/accused as 'Vishnu' instead of 'Jishnu', which is mistakenly crept in the application as well as in the order, which was passed by this Court.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the

learned Public Prosecutor. The learned Public Prosecutor admits that there is a mistake in the name of the applicant/accused and the actual name of he applicant/accused is 'Vishnu'. Hence, the correction petition is allowed. Registry is directed to carry out the correction in the application as also in the consequent order passed by this Court. Sd/- ASHOK MENON JUDGE jg /true copy/ Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2021 Same Parties Jishnu vs State of Kerala Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice Ashok Menon