Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

E.J.Davis vs State of Kerala

E.J.Davis vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Feb 25, 2021
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1590993

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/295/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

E.J.Davis

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice sunil thomas thursday, the 25th day of february 2021 / 6th phalguna, 1942 petitioner/s: e.j.davis aged 62 years s/o. jose(late), proprietor, sea line restaurant, cherai-kuzhuppilly beach road, cherai, ernakulam district - 683514. by advs. sri.m.g.karthikeyan sri.nireesh mathew respondent/s: 1 state of kerala represented by secretary, taxes(a)department, government secretariat, thiruvananthapuram - 695001.2 the excise commissioner commissionerate of excise, thiruvananthapuram - 695033, 3 the deputy commissioner of excise, ernakulam - 682018, 4 teh circle inspector of excise, aluva - 683102, ernakulam district. sr.gp k.p harish this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 25.02.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentwhen the matter was taken up, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. this is recorded and the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- sunil thomas, judge r.av

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 6TH PHALGUNA, 1942 PETITIONER/S: E.J.DAVIS AGED 62 YEARS S/O. JOSE(LATE), PROPRIETOR, SEA LINE RESTAURANT, CHERAI-KUZHUPPILLY BEACH ROAD, CHERAI, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683514. BY ADVS. SRI.M.G.KARTHIKEYAN SRI.NIREESH MATHEW RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, TAXES(A)DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001.

2 THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONERATE OF EXCISE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695033, 3 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, ERNAKULAM - 682018, 4 TEH CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE, ALUVA - 683102, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. SR.GP K.P HARISH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

When the matter was taken up, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. This is recorded and the Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- SUNIL THOMAS, JUDGE R.AV

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial