Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rajesh C vs State of Kerala

Rajesh C vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 22, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1590786

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./140/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajesh C

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....colony, maroor p.o, enadimanagalam village, pin-691524 respondents/respondents1. € € €state of kerala, represented by public prosecutor,high court of kerala, pin-6820312. € € € deputy forest range officer, forest station of punnala, pathanapuram range, pin-689695€ €€€application praying that in the circumstances stated therein the high court be pleased to extension of further period of 1 week for the appearance of petitioner before the investigating o•cer, in the interest of €justice. €€€this application coming on for orders upon perusing the application and this court's ‚nal order dated 22.1.2021 in b.a.no.140/2021 and upon hearing the arguments of m/s. manu ramachandran, shri.sameer m nair, r.rajesh (varkala) & t.s.sarath, advocates for the petitioner and the public prosecutor for the respondents, the court passed the following: € € € €€€€€€€€€€ € € p.t.o € € € € mkm€ashok menon, j.------------------------------------ crl.ma no.1/2021 in ba no.140/2021 ------------------------------------- for information purpose dated this the 19 dayth only of march, 2021orderthe bail application was disposed of with a direction to the applicant to surrender before the investigating officer within two weeks. but the applicant was not able to surrender, since he had to go on quarantine because he was in contact with some persons who had affected with covid-19. hence, he seeks extension of time. the crl.ma is allowed and the applicant is directed to surrender before the investigating officer within two weeks from today. sd/- ashok menon judge jg /true copy/ sd/- assistant registrar

Full Judgment

Crl.M.Appl/1/2021 IN Bail Appl. 140/2021 1/2 €

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Present: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON Friday,the 19th day of March 2021/28th Phalguna, 1942 Crl.M.Appl.No1/2021 IN Bail Appl.No.140/2021 CRIME NO.26/2020 OF Pathanapuram Forest Range O•ce , Kollam. For information purpose only PETITIONER/PETITIOINER RAJESH C, S/O.CHELLAPPAN, AGED 40 YEARS, VELAYAMCODE VEEDU, VELAYAMCODE COLONY, MAROOR P.O, ENADIMANAGALAM VILLAGE, PIN-691524 RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

1. € € €STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN-682031

2. € € € DEPUTY FOREST RANGE OFFICER, FOREST STATION OF PUNNALA, PATHANAPURAM RANGE, PIN-689695

€ €€€Application praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court be pleased to extension of further period of 1 week for the appearance of petitioner before the investigating o•cer, in the interest of €justice. €€€This application coming on for orders upon perusing the application and this court's ‚nal order dated 22.1.2021 in B.A.No.140/2021 and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. MANU RAMACHANDRAN, SHRI.SAMEER M NAIR, R.RAJESH (VARKALA) & T.S.SARATH, Advocates for the petitioner and the PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the respondents, the court passed the following: € € € €€€€€€€€€€ € € p.t.o € € € € mkm€

ASHOK MENON, J.

------------------------------------ Crl.MA No.1/2021 in BA No.140/2021 ------------------------------------- For information purpose Dated this the 19 dayth only of March, 2021

ORDER

The bail application was disposed of with a direction to the applicant to surrender before the investigating officer within two weeks. But the applicant was not able to surrender, since he had to go on quarantine because he was in contact with some persons who had affected with Covid-19. Hence, he seeks extension of time. The Crl.MA is allowed and the applicant is directed to surrender before the investigating officer within two weeks from today. Sd/- ASHOK MENON JUDGE jg /true copy/ Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial