Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shamar, vs Devendra Kumar Singh,

Shamar, vs Devendra Kumar Singh,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 22, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1589247

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/393/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shamar,

Respondent

Devendra Kumar Singh,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice a.k.jayasankaran nambiar friday, the 22nd day of july 2022/31st ashadha, 1944 con.case(c).no.393 of 2019 against the judgment dated 13.04.2018 in wp(c).no.11506/2018 of high court of keralapetitioner/petitioner: shamar, aged 40 years s/o. mr. mohammed basheer, regias bunglow, kandachira, peerinad p.o, kollam 691 601. by adv.sri.k.s.hariharaputhran by adv.sri.george mathew by adv.smt.bhanu thilak respondent/1st respondent in w.p.(c): devendra kumar singh, age and father's name not known to the petitioner, principal secretary, agriculture (nca) department, secretariat, thiruvananthapuram 695 001. by sri.bijoy chandran, govt. pleader this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 22.07.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following: cont. case (c).no.393/2019 :: 2 ::judgmentthe learned government pleader submits that the directions in the judgment dated 13.04.2018 in w.p.(c).no.11506 of 2018 have been complied by passing an order dated 22.7.2022, a copy of which is produced before this court. taking note of the said submission, the contempt of court case is closed, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to impugn the said order, in appropriate proceedings, if so advised. sd/- a.k.jayasankaran nambiar judge prp/22/7/22 cont. case (c).no.393/2019 :: 3 :: appendix of con.case(c).no.393/2019 petitioner annexures: annexure a1 copy of judgment dtd 13-04-2018 in w.p(c) no. 11506 of 2018 of this hon'ble court. annexure a2 true copy of receipt of dtd. 26-05-2018 issued from the office of 1st respondent. annexure a3 true copy of letter dtd. 23-09-2018 sent by petitioner to the 1st respondent. annexure a4 true copy of acknowledgement card dtd. 24-09-2018. respondents exhibits: nil. //true copy// p.s. to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JULY 2022/31ST ASHADHA, 1944 CON.CASE(C).NO.393 OF 2019 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 13.04.2018 IN WP(C).NO.11506/2018 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA

PETITIONER/PETITIONER: SHAMAR, AGED 40 YEARS S/O. MR. MOHAMMED BASHEER, REGIAS BUNGLOW, KANDACHIRA, PEERINAD P.O, KOLLAM 691 601. BY ADV.SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN BY ADV.SRI.GEORGE MATHEW BY ADV.SMT.BHANU THILAK RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT IN W.P.(C): DEVENDRA KUMAR SINGH, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE (NCA) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001. BY SRI.BIJOY CHANDRAN, GOVT. PLEADER THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.07.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Cont. Case (C).NO.393/2019 :: 2 ::

JUDGMENT

The learned Government Pleader submits that the directions in the judgment dated 13.04.2018 in W.P.(C).No.11506 of 2018 have been complied by passing an order dated 22.7.2022, a copy of which is produced before this Court. Taking note of the said submission, the Contempt of Court Case is closed, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to impugn the said order, in appropriate proceedings, if so advised. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE prp/22/7/22 Cont. Case (C).NO.393/2019 :: 3 :: APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C).NO.393/2019 PETITIONER ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A1 COPY OF JUDGMENT DTD 13-04-2018 IN W.P(C) NO. 11506 OF 2018 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF RECEIPT OF DTD. 26-05-2018 ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF 1ST RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE A3 TRUE COPY OF LETTER DTD. 23-09-2018 SENT BY PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE A4 TRUE COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD DTD. 24-09-2018. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial