Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

D. Chandran vs Vaneeswari

D. Chandran vs Vaneeswari

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 27, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1583417

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CONT P(MD)/829/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

D. Chandran

Respondent

Vaneeswari

Excerpt

before the madurai bench of madras high court dated: 27.02.2026coram:the honourable mr.justice b.pugalendhi in wp(md)no.7018 of 2023 d.chandran ... petitioner/petitioner vs. dindigul - 624 001. ... contemnor / respondent prayer: petition filed under section 11 of the contempt of courts act, to initiate contempt proceedings against the contemnor / 3rd respondent and punish her for the wilful disobedience of the order of this court in wp(md)no.7018 of 2023, dated 04.04.2024 under the contempt of courts act.for petitioner : mr.j.lawrance for respondent : mrs.d.j.devasenaorderwhen this contempt petition is taken up for hearing the learned counsel for the respondent submits that as directed by this court by order dated 04.04.2024, the matter was placed before the district collector on 04.07.2024 and the district collector in turn has suggested the director of milk production and dairy development to pass orders. the director in turn has directed the 1st respondent to pass suitable orders. accordingly orders have also been passed on 02.04.2025. challenging the same the petitioner has also filed another writ petition before this court. 2.considering the above submission, this contempt petition is closed.dsk to dindigul - 624 001.b.pugalendhi,j.dsk

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.02.2026

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI in WP(MD)No.7018 of 2023 D.Chandran ... Petitioner/Petitioner vs. Dindigul - 624 001. ... Contemnor / Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to initiate contempt proceedings against the contemnor / 3rd respondent and punish her for the wilful disobedience of the order of this court in WP(MD)No.7018 of 2023, dated 04.04.2024 under the Contempt of Courts Act.

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Lawrance For Respondent : Mrs.D.J.Devasena

ORDER

When this contempt petition is taken up for hearing the learned counsel for the respondent submits that as directed by this court by order dated 04.04.2024, the matter was placed before the District Collector on 04.07.2024 and the District Collector in turn has suggested the Director of Milk Production and Dairy Development to pass orders. The Director in turn has directed the 1st respondent to pass suitable orders. Accordingly orders have also been passed on 02.04.2025. Challenging the same the petitioner has also filed another writ petition before this court. 2.Considering the above submission, this contempt petition is closed.

DSK To Dindigul - 624 001.

B.PUGALENDHI,J.

DSK

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial