Pooja vs the State of Karnataka

POOJA vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jan 05, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1578727

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1578727
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: B M Shyam Prasad
Decided On: Jan 05, 2026
Case Number: WP/35930/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

POOJA

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 5th day of january, 2026 before the hon'ble mr. justice b m shyam prasad writ petition no. 35930 of 2024 (gm-res) between: pooja d/o baburao aged about 27 years r/o molkhera humnabad tahlauk bidar district 585 330. digitally signed by vanamala n …petitioner location: (by smt. jyothi s k.,advocate) high court of karnataka and:1. the state of karnataka rep. chief secretary room no 320, 3rd floor bengaluru 560001. -2-2. the department of personnel and administrative reforms rep by its principal secretary.3. the karnataka publicservice commission udyog soudha rep by its secretary. …respondents (by sri.sidhartha babu rao., aga for r1 & r2; sri. k.m. prakash., advocate for r3) this wp is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to- direct the respondents to evaluate and consider the better result from the 2 examinations undertaken by the petitioner. this petition, coming on for orders, this day, order was made therein as under: -3- coram: hon'ble mr. justice b m shyam prasadoral orderthe learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo for withdrawal of the petition, which reads as under: "the petitioner prays that this hon'ble court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above petition as the matter stands infructuous, in the interest of justice & equity." the petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. sd/- (b m shyam prasad) judge nv

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 35930 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: POOJA D/O BABURAO AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS R/O MOLKHERA HUMNABAD TAHLAUK BIDAR DISTRICT 585 330. Digitally signed by VANAMALA N …PETITIONER Location: (BY SMT. JYOTHI S K.,ADVOCATE) HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. CHIEF SECRETARY ROOM NO 320, 3RD FLOOR BENGALURU 560001. -2-
2. THE DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
3. THE KARNATAKA PUBLIC
SERVICE COMMISSION UDYOG SOUDHA REP BY ITS SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SIDHARTHA BABU RAO., AGA FOR R1 & R2; SRI. K.M. PRAKASH., ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO- DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO EVALUATE AND CONSIDER THE BETTER RESULT FROM THE 2 EXAMINATIONS UNDERTAKEN BY THE PETITIONER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: -3- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD

ORAL ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo for withdrawal of the petition, which reads as under: "The Petitioner prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner to withdraw the above Petition as the matter stands infructuous, in the interest of justice & equity." The petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE NV

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2026 Same Parties POOJA vs The State of Karnataka Same Judge B M Shyam Prasad