Mr. Kumar K vs State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jan 05, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1578504

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1578504
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: Jyoti M
Decided On: Jan 05, 2026
Case Number: WP/35717/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mr. Kumar K

Respondent

State of Karnataka

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 5th day of january, 2026 before the hon'ble ms. justice jyoti m writ petition no. 35717 of 2025 (gm-keb) between: mr. kumar k s/o late krishnappa naidu aged about 56 years, residing at no. 4036, 'annapurneshwari nilaya', 18th main, 28th cross, banashankari 2nd stage, …petitioner (by sri. m.d.raghunath, advocate) and:1. state of karnataka department of energy digitally signedby thejas vidhana soudha, kumar n bengaluru- 560 001 location: high by its chief secretary.court of karnataka2. bangalore electricity supplycorporation limited by assistant executive engineer, vigilance department, office at 4th, svastika 54, 20 (old no.743), 47th a cross, opposite metro pillar no.20, 8th block, jayanagar, …respondents -2- this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india, seeking certain reliefs. this writ petition is listed for orders, this day, an order is made as under:oral ordersri.m.d.raghunath, counsel for the petitioner appeared in person and submits that a memo has been filed stating that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.2. when queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition.3. the memo as well as the oral submission is placed on record.4. resultantly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- (jyoti m) judge ss list no.: 1 sl no.: 18

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 35717 OF 2025 (GM-KEB) BETWEEN: MR. KUMAR K S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA NAIDU AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 4036, 'ANNAPURNESHWARI NILAYA', 18TH MAIN, 28TH CROSS, BANASHANKARI 2ND STAGE, …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.D.RAGHUNATH, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Digitally signed
by THEJAS                VIDHANA SOUDHA,
KUMAR N                  BENGALURU- 560 001
Location: HIGH           BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY.
COURT OF KARNATAKA
2. BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY
CORPORATION LIMITED BY ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, VIGILANCE DEPARTMENT, OFFICE AT 4TH, SVASTIKA 54, 20 (OLD NO.743), 47TH A CROSS, OPPOSITE METRO PILLAR NO.20, 8TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, …RESPONDENTS -2- THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

ORAL ORDER

Sri.M.D.Raghunath, counsel for the petitioner appeared in person and submits that a memo has been filed stating that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.

2. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition.

3. The memo as well as the oral submission is placed on record.

4. Resultantly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2026 Same Parties Mr. Kumar K vs State of Karnataka Same Judge Jyoti M