Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

D.Ranjitha Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its The Deputy Inspector General of Prison,

D.Ranjitha vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its The Deputy Inspector General of Prison,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 27, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1577385

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP Crl.(MD)/1152/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

D.Ranjitha

Respondent

The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its The Deputy Inspector General of Prison,

Excerpt

.....pid no.284858 on ordinary leave/emergency leave for 28 days for arranging money and to maintain his ailing mother namely meenakshi. for petitioner : mr.m.jegadeesh pandian for respondents : mr.t.senthil kumar additional public prosecutororder[order of the court was made by g.k.ilanthiraiyan, j.] the prayer in the petition is to quash the impugned order passed by the first respondent in no.94/vu.tha.2/2022 dated 30.01.2026 and direct the respondents to release the petitioner's husband namely dinesh kumar, s/o. thangapandi,c.p.no.1276, pid no.284858 on ordinary leave/emergency leave for 28 days for arranging money and to maintain his ailing mother namely meenakshi.2. the husband of the petitioner is convicted under ndps act inc.c. no.15 of 2021 on the file of the ii additional ndps court, madurai on 01.08.2022 and sentenced to under go ten years rigorous imprisonment and the same was also confirmed by this court in crl.a(md) no.600 of 2022.3. while being so, the petitioner being the wife of the convictsubmitted representation seeking emergency leave for her husband since he is languishing in jail for more than four years. however it was rejected on the ground that the convict was convicted under the ndps act and as such rule 21(h)(3) of tamil nadu suspension of sentence rules does not permit to grant leave for the convict.4. therefore this court finds no infirmity or illegality in the orderpassed by the first respondent, hence the petition stands dismissed. however the petitioner is at liberty to file fresh application seeking emergency leave on valid ground. on such representation being filed the authorities concerned are directed to dispose of the same in accordance with law. consequently connected miscellaneous petition stands closed. [g.k.i., j.] [n.s, j.] 27.02.2026 ncc : yes / no index : yes / no internet : yes / no aav to:1. the deputy inspector general of prison madurai range, tamil nadu prison and correctional services2. the superintendent.....

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.02.2026

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR and WMP.Crl.(MD) No.299 of 2026 D.Ranjitha ... Petitioner -vs- The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its

1. The Deputy Inspector General of Prison Madurai Range, Tamil Nadu Prison and Correctional Services

2. The Superintendent Central Prison

3. The Inspector of Police Karimedu Police Station, Madurai District ..Respondents

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in No.94/Vu.tha.2/2022 dated 30.01.2026 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents to release the petitioner's husband namely Dinesh Kumar, S/o. Thangapandi,C.P.No.1276, PID No.284858 on ordinary leave/emergency leave for 28 days for arranging money and to maintain his ailing mother namely Meenakshi. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jegadeesh Pandian For Respondents : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.] The prayer in the petition is to quash the impugned order passed by the first respondent in No.94/Vu.tha.2/2022 dated 30.01.2026 and direct the respondents to release the petitioner's husband namely Dinesh Kumar, S/o. Thangapandi,C.P.No.1276, PID No.284858 on ordinary leave/emergency leave for 28 days for arranging money and to maintain his ailing mother namely Meenakshi.

2. The husband of the petitioner is convicted under NDPS Act in

C.C. No.15 of 2021 on the file of the II Additional NDPS Court, Madurai on 01.08.2022 and sentenced to under go ten years rigorous imprisonment and the same was also confirmed by this Court in Crl.A(MD) No.600 of 2022.

3. While being so, the petitioner being the wife of the convict

submitted representation seeking emergency leave for her husband since he is languishing in jail for more than four years. However it was rejected on the ground that the convict was convicted under the NDPS Act and as such Rule 21(h)(3) of Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules does not permit to grant leave for the convict.

4. Therefore this Court finds no infirmity or illegality in the order

passed by the first respondent, hence the petition stands dismissed. However the petitioner is at liberty to file fresh application seeking emergency leave on valid ground. On such representation being filed the authorities concerned are directed to dispose of the same in accordance with law. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition stands closed. [G.K.I., J.] [N.S, J.] 27.02.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No aav To:

1. The Deputy Inspector General of Prison Madurai Range, Tamil Nadu Prison and Correctional Services

2. The Superintendent Central Prison

3. The Inspector of Police Karimedu Police Station, Madurai District

5. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

and

N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.

aav 27.02.2026

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial