Ramachandran Vs The State represented by its

Ramachandran vs The State represented by its

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 27, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1577096

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1577096
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan,Honourable Mr.Justice N.Senthilkumar
Decided On: Feb 27, 2026
Case Number: WP Crl.(MD)/1194/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramachandran

Respondent

The State represented by its

Excerpt

.....india to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to consider and grant 30 days ordinary leave without escort to the detenue, palani, s/o. sangarapandi aged about 49 years convict no.4296, confined at the central prison, palayamkottai based on the petitioner's representation dated 12.01.2026 sent through registered post and consequently grant such leave. for petitioner : mr.s. manoharan for respondents : mr.t.senthil kumar additional public prosecutororder[order of the court was made by g.k.ilanthiraiyan, j.] the prayer in the writ petition is to direct the respondents to consider and grant 30 days ordinary leave without escort to the detenue, palani, s/o. sangarapandi aged about 49 years convict no.4296, confined at the central prison, palayamkottai based on the petitioner's representation dated 12.01.2026 sent through registered post and consequently grant such leave.2. heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed before this court.3. pending writ petition the representation of the petitioner was considered and rejected by an order dated 26.02.2026.4. recording the same, the writ petition (crl.) stands closed withliberty to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 26.02.2026. [g.k.i., j.] [n.s.., j.] 26.02.2026 ncc : yes / no index : yes / no internet : yes / no aav to:1. the deputy inspector general of prisonsmadurai range madurai 625 016 2.the superintendent of prisons central prison palayamkottai 3.the superintendent of police office of the superintendent of police tirunelveli4. the inspector of police mukkudal police station mukkudal- 627 6015. the additional public prosecutor, madurai bench of madras high court, madurai.g.k.ilanthiraiyan, j.andn.senthilkumar , j.aav 27.02.2026

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :27.02.2026
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR Ramachandran ... Petitioner -vs-
1. The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons
Madurai Range Madurai 625 016 2.The Superintendent of Prisons Central Prison Palayamkottai 3.The Superintendent of Police Office of the Superintendent of Police Tirunelveli
4. The Inspector of Police
Mukkudal Police Station Mukkudal- 627 601 ....Respondents. PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider and grant 30 days ordinary leave without escort to the detenue, Palani, S/o. Sangarapandi aged about 49 years convict No.4296, confined at the Central Prison, Palayamkottai based on the petitioner's representation dated 12.01.2026 sent through registered post and consequently grant such leave. For Petitioner : Mr.S. Manoharan For Respondents : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.] The prayer in the Writ Petition is to direct the respondents to consider and grant 30 days ordinary leave without escort to the detenue, Palani, S/o. Sangarapandi aged about 49 years convict No.4296, confined at the Central Prison, Palayamkottai based on the petitioner's representation dated 12.01.2026 sent through registered post and consequently grant such leave.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed before this Court.

3. Pending Writ petition the representation of the petitioner was considered and rejected by an order dated 26.02.2026.

4. Recording the same, the writ petition (Crl.) stands closed with

liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 26.02.2026. [G.K.I., J.] [N.S.., J.] 26.02.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No aav To:

1. The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons

Madurai Range Madurai 625 016 2.The Superintendent of Prisons Central Prison Palayamkottai 3.The Superintendent of Police Office of the Superintendent of Police Tirunelveli

4. The Inspector of Police Mukkudal Police Station Mukkudal- 627 601

5. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

AND

N.SENTHILKUMAR , J.

aav 27.02.2026

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Ramachandran vs The State represented by its Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan,Honourable Mr.Justic...