Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sannarangappa vs the State of Karnataka

Sannarangappa vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Feb 25, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1572877

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/32381/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sannarangappa

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 25th day of february, 2026 before the hon'ble mr. justice r devdas writ petition no. 32381 of 2024 (scst) between: sannarangappa s/o late rangamma, aged about 75 years, residing at mahalakshmi nagara, gubbi town, gubbi taluk, tumkur district-572 216. …petitioner (by sri. dasappa b., advocate (absent)) and:1. the state of karnataka by its revenue principal secretary, digitally m s building, signed by dr. b r ambedkar beedi, lakshmi t location: bangalore-560 001. high court of karnataka2. the deputy commissioner tumkur district,3. the assistant commissioner tumkur sub-division,4. tahsildar gubbi taluk, gubbi-572 216. -2-5. hanumakka w/o late bheemanna, bidare village, chelur hobli, gubbi taluk-572 117.6. visveshwaraiah s/o late ranganna, nandihalli village, chelur hobli, gubbi taluk, tumkur district-572 117. …respondents (by sri. v. seshu, hcgp) this w.p. is filed under articles 226 and 227 ofthe constitution of india, praying to quash the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent dated 10.06.2024 in ptcl no.39/2022 as per annexure-a, and also set aside the order of the 3rd respondent as per annexure-c. this petition, coming on for orders, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr. justice r devdasoral orderon 11.02.2026 the following order was passed: “finally, two weeks time is granted to the petitioner for compliance of office objections, failing which, the writ petition shall be listed on 25.02.2026 for dismissal.” -3-2. matter is called out. there is no representation for the petitioner.3. office objections have not been complied with.4. consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. sd/- (r devdas) judge hb list no.: 2 sl no.: 1

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 32381 OF 2024 (SCST) BETWEEN: SANNARANGAPPA S/O LATE RANGAMMA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, RESIDING AT MAHALAKSHMI NAGARA, GUBBI TOWN, GUBBI TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 216. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DASAPPA B., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS REVENUE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, Digitally M S BUILDING, signed by DR. B R AMBEDKAR BEEDI, LAKSHMI T Location: BANGALORE-560 001. High Court of Karnataka

2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TUMKUR DISTRICT,

3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TUMKUR SUB-DIVISION,

4. TAHSILDAR GUBBI TALUK, GUBBI-572 216. -2-

5. HANUMAKKA W/O LATE BHEEMANNA, BIDARE VILLAGE, CHELUR HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK-572 117.

6. VISVESHWARAIAH S/O LATE RANGANNA, NANDIHALLI VILLAGE, CHELUR HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 117. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V. SESHU, HCGP) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 10.06.2024 IN PTCL NO.39/2022 AS PER ANNEXURE-A, AND ALSO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT AS PER ANNEXURE-C. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS

ORAL ORDER

On 11.02.2026 the following order was passed: “Finally, two weeks time is granted to the petitioner for compliance of office objections, failing which, the writ petition shall be listed on 25.02.2026 for dismissal.” -3-

2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner.

3. Office objections have not been complied with.

4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE HB List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial