Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

P.V.Midhun vs Union of India

P.V.Midhun vs Union of India

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 18, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1572012

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/30867/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.V.Midhun

Respondent

Union of India

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice n.nagaresh tuesday, the 18th day of january 2022/28th pousha, 1943 wp(c) no. 30867 of 2021 petitioner: p.v.midhun, advocate, aged 39, s/o. late p.v. madhavan, "stone', thavakkara, kannur, pin - 670 002. by adv p.t.abhilash respondents: 1 union of india represented by its secretary, health & family welfare, nirman bhavan, new delhi, pin - 110 011. 2 state of kerala represented by its principal secretary, health and welfare department, annex -ii, secretariat, thiruvananthapuram - 695 001. 3 airport authority of india, corporate headquarter, rajiv gandhi bhawan, safdarjung airport, new delhi - 110 003. 4 cochin international airport ltd., nedumbassery, aluva, ernakulam district, pin - 683 111, 5 kannur international airport limited, mattannur, kannur - 670 702, 6 airport director, airport authority of india, calicut international airport, malappuram district, pin - 673 647. 7 micro health laboratories, mps tower, aryadathupalam, opp. federal bank tower, mavoor road, kozhikode - 670 004. r1 by sri.s.manu, asgi r2 by sri.appu p.s., g.p. r3, r4 & r6 by sri.s.sujin, sc r5 by sri.m.gopikrishnan nambiar, sc this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 18.01.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 18th day of january, 2022 the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to prosecute the writ petition. accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- n. nagaresh judge ncd/18.01.2022

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH TUESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022/28TH POUSHA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 30867 OF 2021 PETITIONER: P.V.MIDHUN, ADVOCATE, AGED 39, S/O. LATE P.V. MADHAVAN, "STONE', THAVAKKARA, KANNUR, PIN - 670 002. BY ADV P.T.ABHILASH RESPONDENTS: 1 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE, NIRMAN BHAVAN, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110 011. 2 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HEALTH AND WELFARE DEPARTMENT, ANNEX -II, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 3 AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA, CORPORATE HEADQUARTER, RAJIV GANDHI BHAWAN, SAFDARJUNG AIRPORT, NEW DELHI - 110 003. 4 COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD., NEDUMBASSERY, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683 111, 5 KANNUR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LIMITED, MATTANNUR, KANNUR - 670 702, 6 AIRPORT DIRECTOR, AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA, CALICUT INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673 647. 7 MICRO HEALTH LABORATORIES, MPS TOWER, ARYADATHUPALAM, OPP. FEDERAL BANK TOWER, MAVOOR ROAD, KOZHIKODE - 670 004. R1 BY SRI.S.MANU, ASGI R2 BY SRI.APPU P.S., G.P. R3, R4 & R6 BY SRI.S.SUJIN, SC R5 BY SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.01.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 18th day of January, 2022 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to prosecute the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- N. NAGARESH JUDGE ncd/18.01.2022

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial