Sini Vasanthy, vs Hareesh,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Nov 29, 2022

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1570321

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1570321
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice C.S.Dias
Decided On: Nov 29, 2022
Case Number: Tr.P(C)/688/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sini Vasanthy,

Respondent

Hareesh,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias tuesday, the 29th day of november 2022 / 8th agrahayana, 1944 tr.p(c) no. 688 of 2022 in opdiv 587/2022 of family court, pathanamthitta petitioner: sini vasanthy, aged 36 years d/o.surendran and w/o.hareesh mohanan kottarathi, elimullumplackal, konni po, pathanamthitta-689 691. by adv divya b.nair respondent: hareesh, aged 43 years s/o. mohanan, mekku puthenveedu, panthaplavu po, pattazhi, kollam-691 522. this transfer petition (civil) having come up for admission on 29.11.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following: -:2:- dated this the 29th day of november,2022orderthe transfer petition was filed to transfer o.p. (div)no.587/2022(annexure-a2) from the family court, pathanamthitta to the additional district court-ii, pathanamthitta, on the ground that there is no video conferencing facility available in the family court, pathanamthitta.2. pursuant to the order dated 23.11.2022 passed by this court, the learned judge of the familycourt, pathanamthitta, by communication dated 26.11.2022, has informed this court that the online counselling between the petitioner and the respondent was conducted by the principal counsellor of the said court through whatsapp video call.3. the learned counsel appearing for thepetitioner submits that the report stated by the learned -:3:- judge of the family court is correct and the counselling proceeding is over. therefore, nothing further survives in the transfer petition. in the light of the above report and the grievance of the petitioner being redressed, i hold that there is no reason to transfer the proceedings as sought for in the transfer petition. hence, the transfer petition is dismissed as infructuous. sd/- c.s.dias,judge dst/29.11.22 //true copy/ p.a.to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 8TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944 TR.P(C) NO. 688 OF 2022 IN OPDIV 587/2022 OF FAMILY COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA PETITIONER: SINI VASANTHY, AGED 36 YEARS D/O.SURENDRAN AND W/O.HAREESH MOHANAN KOTTARATHI, ELIMULLUMPLACKAL, KONNI PO, PATHANAMTHITTA-689 691. BY ADV DIVYA B.NAIR RESPONDENT: HAREESH, AGED 43 YEARS S/O. MOHANAN, MEKKU PUTHENVEEDU, PANTHAPLAVU PO, PATTAZHI, KOLLAM-691 522. THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -:2:- Dated this the 29th day of November,2022

ORDER

The transfer petition was filed to transfer O.P. (Div)No.587/2022(Annexure-A2) from the Family Court, Pathanamthitta to the Additional District Court-II, Pathanamthitta, on the ground that there is no video conferencing facility available in the Family Court, Pathanamthitta.

2. Pursuant to the order dated 23.11.2022 passed by this Court, the learned Judge of the Family

Court, Pathanamthitta, by communication dated 26.11.2022, has informed this Court that the online counselling between the petitioner and the respondent was conducted by the Principal Counsellor of the said court through Whatsapp video call.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner submits that the report stated by the learned -:3:- Judge of the Family Court is correct and the counselling proceeding is over. Therefore, nothing further survives in the transfer petition. In the light of the above report and the grievance of the petitioner being redressed, I hold that there is no reason to transfer the proceedings as sought for in the transfer petition. Hence, the transfer petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- C.S.DIAS,JUDGE DST/29.11.22 //True copy/ P.A.To Judge

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2022 Same Parties Sini Vasanthy, vs Hareesh, Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice C.S.Dias