Ajithkumar Vs The Inspector of Police

Ajithkumar vs The Inspector of Police

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 30, 2026

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1569972

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1569972
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi
Decided On: Mar 30, 2026
Case Number: CRL MP(MD)/14362/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ajithkumar

Respondent

The Inspector of Police

Excerpt

.....court for exclusive trial of pocso act cases, madurai, was found guilty by the trial court and was convicted and sentenced to undergo 7 years imprisonment, fine of rs.5,000/-, in default to pay fine, 6 months si for the offence punishable undersection 3(a) r/w 4 of pocso act.2. as against the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court in spl.sc.no.64 of2017, dated 27.04.2022, the petitioner has filed a criminal appeal in crl.a(md)no.924 of 2023 and the same was admitted by this court on 12.10.2023. the petitioner has also moved this application to suspend the sentence imposed on him by the trial court.3. though this application was filed in the year 2023, this application was not prosecutedfrom day one. initially, when this application was listed on 07.03.2024, it was adjourned. subsequently, when it was listed on 25.03.2026, at request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, it was adjourned to 27.03.2026. however, when this application was listed on 27.03.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the registry was directed to list this matter under the caption 'for dismissal' on 30.03.2026. even today, there is no representation for the petitioner.4. the learned government advocate appearing for the respondent submits that the victimboy is aged only 17 years and he was mentally retarded. on the date of occurrence, while the victim boy was playing, the petitioner, who is aged about 24 years has taken him to a secluded placed and had oral sex. he also pointed out that the typed set of papers are made ready and prayed for final disposal of the case.5. since there is no representation for the petitioner and that typed set of papers in the main appeal are made ready, this criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed.6. post the main appeal for final disposal, in the usual course. 30-03-2026 mbi to 1.the learned sessions judge, principal special court for exclusive trial of pocso act cases,2. the inspector of police,.....

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30-03-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI in Crl.A.(MD)No.924 of 2023 Ajithkumar Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The Inspector of Police,
In Crime No.1358/2017. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): No appearance For Respondent(s): Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad, Government Advocate Prayer: To suspend the sentence imposed against the petitioner by the Principal Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under Prevention of Children from Sexual Offences Act, Madurai in Spl SC No.64/2017 dated 27.04.2022 and release the petitioner on bail till.

ORDER

The petitioner, sole accused in Spl.SC.No.64 of 2017, on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Principal Special Court for Exclusive Trial of POCSO Act cases, Madurai, was found guilty by the trial Court and was convicted and sentenced to undergo 7 years imprisonment, fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default to pay fine, 6 months SI for the offence punishable under

Section 3(a) r/w 4 of POCSO Act.

2. As against the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial Court in Spl.SC.No.64 of

2017, dated 27.04.2022, the petitioner has filed a Criminal Appeal in Crl.A(MD)No.924 of 2023 and the same was admitted by this Court on 12.10.2023. The petitioner has also moved this application to suspend the sentence imposed on him by the trial Court.

3. Though this application was filed in the year 2023, this application was not prosecuted

from day one. Initially, when this application was listed on 07.03.2024, it was adjourned. Subsequently, when it was listed on 25.03.2026, at request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, it was adjourned to 27.03.2026. However, when this application was listed on 27.03.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the Registry was directed to list this matter under the caption 'for dismissal' on 30.03.2026. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner.

4. The learned Government advocate appearing for the respondent submits that the victim

boy is aged only 17 years and he was mentally retarded. On the date of occurrence, while the victim boy was playing, the petitioner, who is aged about 24 years has taken him to a secluded placed and had oral sex. He also pointed out that the typed set of papers are made ready and prayed for final disposal of the case.

5. Since there is no representation for the petitioner and that typed set of papers in the main appeal are made ready, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed.

6. Post the main appeal for final disposal, in the usual course. 30-03-2026 mbi To 1.The learned Sessions Judge, Principal Special Court for Exclusive Trial of POCSO Act cases,

2. The Inspector of Police, 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Ajithkumar vs The Inspector of Police Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi