Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jeyanthi Vs The Tahsildhar

Jeyanthi vs The Tahsildhar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 18, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1565352

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(MD)/4510/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jeyanthi

Respondent

The Tahsildhar

Excerpt

.....the petitioner submitted a representation dated 14.01.2026 before the respondent seeking mutation of patta. however, despite the lapse of considerable time, no action has been taken on the petitioner’s representation. hence, the present writ petition.4. the learned special government pleader appearing for the respondentwould submit that the petitioner's representation will be considered and appropriate orders will be passed on merits and in accordance with law within a time frame to be fixed by this court.5. recording the above submission, and without expressing any opinion onthe merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 14.01.2026, and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, and any other persons, who may be affected by such decision, within a period of sixteen weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. there shall be no order as to costs.ncc : yes / no (k.surender, j.) index : yes / no 18.02.2026 smn2 to:- the tahsildhar, kulithalai taluk, karur district.k.surender, j.smn2 18.02.2026

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.02.2026

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER

Jeyanthi ... Petitioner -vs- The Tahsildhar, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District. ... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the representation dated 14.01.2026 pertaining to mutation of petitioner's name in Patta No.4 Revenue Records in Ward B, Block No.2, Vellar Street, Kadambur Kovil, Vaiganallur North Village, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District and to dispose the same within the stipulated time as fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Saravanan For Respondent : Mr.P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the representation dated 14.01.2026 pertaining to mutation of petitioner's name in Patta No.4 Revenue Records in Ward B, Block No.2, Vellar Street, Kadambur Kovil, Vaiganallur North Village, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District and to dispose the same within the stipulated time as fixed by this Court.

2. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the

petitioner is in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property after the demise of her husband. The petitioner submitted a representation dated 14.01.2026 before the respondent seeking mutation of patta. However, despite the lapse of considerable time, no action has been taken on the petitioner’s representation. Hence, the present Writ Petition.

4. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent

would submit that the petitioner's representation will be considered and appropriate orders will be passed on merits and in accordance with law within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

5. Recording the above submission, and without expressing any opinion on

the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 14.01.2026, and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, and any other persons, who may be affected by such decision, within a period of sixteen weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

NCC : Yes / No (K.SURENDER, J.) Index : Yes / No 18.02.2026 smn2 To:- The Tahsildhar, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District.

K.SURENDER, J.

smn2 18.02.2026

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial