Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Siddique vs Azif

Siddique vs AZIF

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Nov 14, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1561963

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP(C)/2055/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Siddique

Respondent

AZIF

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias monday, the 14th day of november 2022 / 23rd karthika, 1944 op(c) no. 2055 of 2022 in i.a.no.3/2022 in os 13/2016 of sub court, nedumangad petitioner/petitioner/plaintiff: siddique, aged 44 years, s/o. abdul rehman, siddique manzil, udiyancode, pangode village, nedumangadu taluk, by advs. g.sudheer r.harikrishnan (h-308) respondents/respondents/defendants 1& 2 & garnishees: 1 azif, aged 56 years, s/o. abdul razak, sakkir manzil, vanchuvam, chullimanoor, nedumangadu taluk, 2 k.a.shekhar aged 51 years s/o. arumukhan, uma nivas, tc. 55/666(6), vinayaka nagar, niramankara, nemom village, pappanamcode, thiruvananthapuram district , pin - 695018 3 the salary disbursing officer/the director collegiate education, vikas bhavan p.o., thiruvananthapuram represented by government pleader,high court of kerala, pin - 695033 4 the drawing and disbursing officer mannania arts and science college, pangode, pangode p.o., nedumangadu taluk, thiruvananthapuram , pin - 695609 this op (civil) having come up for admission on 14.11.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following: o.p.(c)no.2055/2022 -:2:- dated this the 14th day of november,2022judgmentthe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that even though the original petition was filed to direct the court of the subordinate judge, nedumangad, to dispose of i.a.no.3/2022 in o.s.no.13/2016, now the court below has already passed orders on the said application. therefore, the original petition has become infructuous.2. the said submission is recorded. the original petition is dismissed as infructuous. sd/- c.s.dias,judge dst/14.11.22 //true copy/ p.a.to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 23RD KARTHIKA, 1944 OP(C) NO. 2055 OF 2022 IN I.A.NO.3/2022 IN OS 13/2016 OF SUB COURT, NEDUMANGAD PETITIONER/PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF: SIDDIQUE, AGED 44 YEARS, S/O. ABDUL REHMAN, SIDDIQUE MANZIL, UDIYANCODE, PANGODE VILLAGE, NEDUMANGADU TALUK, BY ADVS. G.SUDHEER R.HARIKRISHNAN (H-308) RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS 1& 2 & GARNISHEES: 1 AZIF, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O. ABDUL RAZAK, SAKKIR MANZIL, VANCHUVAM, CHULLIMANOOR, NEDUMANGADU TALUK, 2 K.A.SHEKHAR AGED 51 YEARS S/O. ARUMUKHAN, UMA NIVAS, TC. 55/666(6), VINAYAKA NAGAR, NIRAMANKARA, NEMOM VILLAGE, PAPPANAMCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT , PIN - 695018 3 THE SALARY DISBURSING OFFICER/THE DIRECTOR COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, VIKAS BHAVAN P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 695033 4 THE DRAWING AND DISBURSING OFFICER MANNANIA ARTS AND SCIENCE COLLEGE, PANGODE, PANGODE P.O., NEDUMANGADU TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM , PIN - 695609 THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: O.P.(C)No.2055/2022 -:2:- Dated this the 14th day of November,2022

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that even though the original petition was filed to direct the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Nedumangad, to dispose of I.A.No.3/2022 in O.S.No.13/2016, now the court below has already passed orders on the said application. Therefore, the original petition has become infructuous.

2. The said submission is recorded. The original petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- C.S.DIAS,JUDGE DST/14.11.22 //True copy/ P.A.To Judge

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial