Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

A.Seethapathi Vs The Tahsildhar

A.Seethapathi vs The Tahsildhar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 17, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1561100

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(MD)/4381/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A.Seethapathi

Respondent

The Tahsildhar

Excerpt

.....of the said property. despite receipt of the said representations, no further effective steps have been taken by the authorities. hence, the petitioner has been constrained to file the present writ petition seeking appropriate directions to enable the authorities to conduct the survey and fix the boundaries.5. the learned special government pleader appearing for the respondents1 and 2 would submit that proper steps would be taken to survey and demarcate the land in accordance with sections 9 and 10 of the tamil nadu survey and boundaries act, 1923.6. recording the aforesaid submission, this court directs the respondents 1and 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.01.2026 and demarcate the subject property, after considering the claims of the petitioner, the third respondent and any other rival parties, if any, and to pass orders in accordance with sections 9 and 10 of the tamil nadu survey and boundaries act, 1923, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. in the event of any rival claims, the parties are at liberty to work out their remedies before the civil court.7. with the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. there shall be no order as to costs. ncc : yes / no (k.surender, j.) index : yes / no 17.02.2026 smn2 to:- 1.the tahsildar, 2.the taluk surveyor,k.surender, j.smn2 17.02.2026

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.02.2026

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER A.Seethapathi ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Tahsildar, 2.The Taluk Surveyor, 3.Kottaisamy ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to conduct the survey by demarcating the boundary line between Survey No.510/8A and Survey No.510/9, situated at Narasingapuram Village, Athoor Taluk, Dindigul District, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sekar For R1 and R2 : Mr.P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to conduct the survey by demarcating the boundary line between Survey No.510/8A and Survey No.510/9, situated at Narasingapuram Village, Athoor Taluk, Dindigul District, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

3. Since no adverse orders are going to be passed against the third respondent, notice to the third respondent is hereby dispensed with.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is

the absolute owner of the subject property and is in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the same. It is further submitted that the petitioner made several representations, including a representation dated 27.01.2026 before the competent authorities, seeking survey and fixation of boundaries in respect of the said property. Despite receipt of the said representations, no further effective steps have been taken by the authorities. Hence, the petitioner has been constrained to file the present Writ Petition seeking appropriate directions to enable the authorities to conduct the survey and fix the boundaries.

5. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents

1 and 2 would submit that proper steps would be taken to survey and demarcate the land in accordance with Sections 9 and 10 of the Tamil Nadu Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923.

6. Recording the aforesaid submission, this Court directs the respondents 1

and 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.01.2026 and demarcate the subject property, after considering the claims of the petitioner, the third respondent and any other rival parties, if any, and to pass orders in accordance with Sections 9 and 10 of the Tamil Nadu Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In the event of any rival claims, the parties are at liberty to work out their remedies before the Civil Court.

7. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. NCC : Yes / No (K.SURENDER, J.) Index : Yes / No 17.02.2026 smn2 To:- 1.The Tahsildar, 2.The Taluk Surveyor,

K.SURENDER, J.

smn2 17.02.2026

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial