Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Manohar vs State of Karnataka

Manohar vs State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jun 01, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1560463

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.P/9484/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manohar

Respondent

State of Karnataka

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 1st day of june, 2026 before the hon'ble mr. justice m.nagaprasanna criminal petition no. 9484 of 2024 between:1. manohar s/o late muniraju aged about 26 years2. nagavenid/o narayanappa aged about 53 years digitally signed by sanjeevini bangalore rural district - 562 110. j karishetty location: high court of 3. prakash karnataka s/o narayanappa aged about 43 years r/at sabbenahalli village, manchanebele hobli chikkaballapura taluk - 562 101. …petitioners (by sri. jose sebastian, advocate) -2- and:1. state of karnatakaby devanahalli police station, devanahalli, bangalore rural district represented by state public prosecutor, high court of karnataka, ambedkar veedhi, bengaluru - 560 091.2. suma w/o manohar r/at banashankari layout, bychapur road, devanahalli town, bangalore rural district - 562 110factually: suma, w/o hemanth r/at no. 448, ganthrige, pillanavara beedi, devanahalli , …respondents (by sri. b.n. jagadeesha, addl. spp for r1) this crl.p is filed u/s 482 of cr.pc (filed u/s 528 bnss) praying to quash all the proceedings crime no.6/2024 by the devanahalli police based on the complaint of the 2nd respondent under section 498a of ipc and section 3 and 4 of the dowry prohibition act. this petition, coming on for admission, this day,order was made therein as under:-3- coram: hon'ble mr. justice m.nagaprasannaoral orderlearned additional state public prosecutor on instructions would submit that the ‘b’ report has been filed.2. in the light of filing of the ‘b’ report, the present petition has rendered infructuous.3. reserving liberty to the petitioners to knock at the doors of appropriate fora, in the event of need, the petition stands disposed. sd/- (m.nagaprasanna) judge sjk list no.: 1 sl no.: 6

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9484 OF 2024 BETWEEN:

1. MANOHAR S/O LATE MUNIRAJU AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS

2. NAGAVENI

D/O NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of 3. PRAKASH Karnataka S/O NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT SABBENAHALLI VILLAGE, MANCHANEBELE HOBLI CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK - 562 101. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. JOSE SEBASTIAN, ADVOCATE) -2- AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY DEVANAHALLI POLICE STATION, DEVANAHALLI, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 091.

2. SUMA W/O MANOHAR R/AT BANASHANKARI LAYOUT, BYCHAPUR ROAD, DEVANAHALLI TOWN, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110

FACTUALLY: SUMA, W/O HEMANTH R/AT NO. 448, GANTHRIGE, PILLANAVARA BEEDI, DEVANAHALLI , …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.N. JAGADEESHA, ADDL. SPP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH ALL THE PROCEEDINGS CRIME NO.6/2024 BY THE DEVANAHALLI POLICE BASED ON THE COMPLAINT OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 498A OF IPC AND SECTION 3 AND 4 OF THE DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

-3- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

ORAL ORDER

Learned Additional State Public Prosecutor on instructions would submit that the ‘B’ report has been filed.

2. In the light of filing of the ‘B’ report, the present petition has rendered infructuous.

3. Reserving liberty to the petitioners to knock at the doors of appropriate fora, in the event of need, the petition stands disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial