Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Krishnan vs Chandra

Krishnan vs Chandra

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 30, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1559786

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRP(MD)/466/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Krishnan

Respondent

Chandra

Excerpt

before the madurai bench of madras high court dated: 30.01.2026coramthe hon'ble mr.justice n.senthilkumar and c.m.p(md)no.2231 of 2023 1.krishnan 2.uthayakumar ... petitioners 1 & 2/ petitioners 1 & 2 vs. 1.chandra 2.n.sankaranarayanan 3.n.muthu meenakshi 4.rathnapriya ramalingam ... respondents 1 to 4/ respondents 1 to 4 prayer: civil revision petition is filed under article 227 of constitution of india, to call for the records relating to the order dated 30.01.2023 in moo.mu.no.352/2022/j passed by the rental control authority cum revenue divisional officer, madurai and set aside the same.for petitioners : mr.r.gandhi senior counsel for mr.j.karthikeyan for respondents : no appearanceorderthis civil revision petition has been filed challenging the orderpassed in moo.mu.no.352/2022/j, dated 30.01.2023, by the rental control authority-cum-revenue divisional officer, madurai.2. the learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted thatthe issue has been amicably settled between the parties. it is further submitted that the petitioners have filed an affidavit, dated 29.01.2026 stating that they have entered into a compromise with the respondents. the compromise is with regard to vacating the tenancy property.3. in view of the compromise entered into between the parties, nothing survives for further adjudication in this civil revision petition.4. recording the said compromise, this civil revision petition isclosed. the affidavit filed by the petitioners, dated 29.01.2026 shall form part of this order. consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. no costs. ncc : yes / no index : yes / no internet : yes / no to 1.the rental control authority cum revenue divisional officer, madurai. 2.the section officer vernacular section, madurai bench of madras high court, madurai.n.senthilkumar,j.

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.01.2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR and C.M.P(MD)No.2231 of 2023 1.Krishnan 2.Uthayakumar ... Petitioners 1 & 2/ Petitioners 1 & 2 Vs. 1.Chandra 2.N.Sankaranarayanan 3.N.Muthu Meenakshi 4.Rathnapriya Ramalingam ... Respondents 1 to 4/ Respondents 1 to 4 PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to call for the records relating to the order dated 30.01.2023 in Moo.Mu.No.352/2022/J passed by the Rental Control Authority Cum Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai and set aside the same.

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Gandhi Senior Counsel For Mr.J.Karthikeyan For Respondents : No Appearance

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the order

passed in Moo.Mu.No.352/2022/J, dated 30.01.2023, by the Rental Control Authority-cum-Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai.

2. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that

the issue has been amicably settled between the parties. It is further submitted that the petitioners have filed an affidavit, dated 29.01.2026 stating that they have entered into a compromise with the respondents. The compromise is with regard to vacating the tenancy property.

3. In view of the compromise entered into between the parties, nothing survives for further adjudication in this Civil Revision Petition.

4. Recording the said compromise, this Civil Revision Petition is

closed. The affidavit filed by the petitioners, dated 29.01.2026 shall form part of this order. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs. NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No To 1.The Rental Control Authority Cum Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai. 2.The Section Officer Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

N.SENTHILKUMAR,J.

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Krishnan vs Chandra Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice N.Senthilkumar

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales