Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ramachandran A Vs The District Collector

Ramachandran A vs The District Collector

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 02, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1559546

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(MD)/3887/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramachandran A

Respondent

The District Collector

Excerpt

before the madurai bench of madras high court date : 02/02/2026coramthe hon`ble mr.justice krishnan ramasamy and wmp(md) no.3767 of 20241. ramachandran a2. kalaiyarasan.r3. anandan.s4. rakesh.r5. anna durai.d ... petitioners vs4. anandan.r, s/o.ramaiyan,5. paramasivam, s/o.kuppusamy, thanjavur district. ... respondentsprayer :- writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying this court to issue a writ of mandamus for a direction, forbearing the respondent no.4 and 5 from conducting the arulmigu sri badrakaliamman temple festival at poiyundarkudikadu, orathanadu taluk, thanjavur district contrary to the peace committee meeting dated 27.02.2023 convened by the respondent no.3.for petitioners : mr.s.rajasekar for respondents : mrs.k.malathi additional government pleader when the writ petition was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer that has been sought for has become infructuous.2. recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed ashaving become infructuous. no costs. consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 02.02.2026 ncc : yes/no index : yes/no rr to krishnan ramasamy, j rr in wp(md) no.3887 of 2024 date : 02.02.2026

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Date : 02/02/2026

CORAM

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice KRISHNAN RAMASAMY and WMP(MD) No.3767 of 2024

1. Ramachandran A

2. Kalaiyarasan.R

3. Anandan.S

4. Rakesh.R

5. Anna Durai.D ... Petitioners Vs

4. Anandan.R, S/o.Ramaiyan,

5. Paramasivam, S/o.Kuppusamy, Thanjavur District. ... Respondents

PRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus for a direction, forbearing the respondent No.4 and 5 from conducting the Arulmigu Sri Badrakaliamman Temple Festival at Poiyundarkudikadu, Orathanadu Taluk, Thanjavur District contrary to the Peace Committee Meeting dated 27.02.2023 convened by the respondent No.3.

For Petitioners : Mr.S.Rajasekar For Respondents : Mrs.K.Malathi Additional Government Pleader When the writ petition was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer that has been sought for has become infructuous.

2. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as

having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 02.02.2026 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No RR To KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J RR IN WP(MD) No.3887 of 2024 Date : 02.02.2026

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial