Maladhi Devi vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jun 30, 2022

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1556515

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1556515
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice P.V.Kunhikrishnan
Decided On: Jun 30, 2022
Case Number: WP(C)/28414/2010

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Maladhi Devi

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

wp(c) no. 16746 of 2010 k.r.radhakrishnan aged 52 years, s/o.ramakrishnan nair, prasanthi, t.c.16/101, thycaud p.o., thiruvananthapuram. 1 corporation of thiruvananthapuram represented by its secretary. 2 town planning officer corporation of thiruvananthapuram. 3 state of kerala rep. by its secretary to government, (local self government institutions), secretariat, sri.p.k.manojkumar, sc this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 30.06.2022, along with wp(c).28414/2010, the court on the same day delivered the following: wp(c) no. 28414 of 2010 maladhi devi, w/o.shri.bhuvanachandran nair, aged 56 years, roopasree, kaavu vila, vaavra ambalam, pothencode,1 state of kerala represented by secretary to government, local self government institutions, secretariat, 2 corporation of thiruvananthapuram thiruvananthapuram corporation office, 3 town planning officer corporation of thiruvananthapuram - 695 001. 4 the thiruvananthapuram medical college area development authority, represented by the chief town planner - 695 001. 5 trivandrum development authority trivandrum - 695 001.sri.p.k.manojkumar this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 30.06.2022, along with wp(c).16746/2010, the court on the same day delivered the following:p.v.kunhikrishnan, j.------------------------------ w.p.(c).nos. 16746 & 28414 of 2010 ---------------------------------------------- dated this the 30th day of june, 2022judgmentwhen these writ petitions came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that, even though a registered letter is send to the parties, there is no response. therefore, these writ petitions are dismissed for non prosecution. sd/- p.v.kunhikrishnan dm judge

Full Judgment

WP(C) NO. 16746 OF 2010 K.R.RADHAKRISHNAN AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.RAMAKRISHNAN NAIR, PRASANTHI, T.C.16/101, THYCAUD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 1 CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2 TOWN PLANNING OFFICER CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3 STATE OF KERALA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, (LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS), SECRETARIAT, SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.06.2022, ALONG WITH WP(C).28414/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 28414 OF 2010 MALADHI DEVI, W/O.SHRI.BHUVANACHANDRAN NAIR, AGED 56 YEARS, ROOPASREE, KAAVU VILA, VAAVRA AMBALAM, POTHENCODE,
1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS, SECRETARIAT, 2 CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CORPORATION OFFICE, 3 TOWN PLANNING OFFICER CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 4 THE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM MEDICAL COLLEGE AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF TOWN PLANNER - 695 001. 5 TRIVANDRUM DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TRIVANDRUM - 695 001.
SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.06.2022, ALONG WITH WP(C).16746/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
------------------------------ W.P.(C).Nos. 16746 & 28414 of 2010 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of June, 2022

JUDGMENT

When these writ petitions came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that, even though a registered letter is send to the parties, there is no response. Therefore, these writ petitions are dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN DM JUDGE

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2022 Same Parties Maladhi Devi vs State of Kerala Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice P.V.Kunhikrishnan