Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Neenadas vs the State of Kerala

Neenadas vs The State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Mar 30, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1554315

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/26814/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Neenadas

Respondent

The State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice bechu kurian thomas wednesday, the 30th day of march 2022 / 9th chaithra, 1944 petitioner : neenadas aged 54 years w/o. prasenan, hsa (physical science), sivagiri high school, varkala, thiruvananthapuram district. by adv k.rakesh respondents : 1 the state of kerala, represented by the secretary to government, department of general education, 2 the deputy secretary, general education (e) department, 3 the under secretary, general education (e/j) department, 4 director of public instructions, directorate of public instructions, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695 001.5 the deputy director of education killippalam, thiruvananthapuram district, pin - 695 002. 6 the district educational officer, attingal, thiruvananthapuram district, pin - 695 101. 7 d. binidas hsa (english under dispute), sivagiri high school, varkala, 8 the corporate manager snds trust, sivagiri, varkala, by advs. sri.m.v.thamban sri.r.reji smt.thara thamban sri.b.bipin sri.arun bose s.ramesh by joby joseph, govt.pleader this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 30.03.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following:bechu kurian thomas, j.w.p.(c) no.26814 of 2019 dated this the 30th day of march, 2022judgmentthe learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner does not intend to pursue the writ petition and a memo to that effect has been filed. accordingly this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed in terms of the memo. sd/- bechu kurian thomas, judge rkm

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 9TH CHAITHRA, 1944 PETITIONER : NEENADAS AGED 54 YEARS W/O. PRASENAN, HSA (PHYSICAL SCIENCE), SIVAGIRI HIGH SCHOOL, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV K.RAKESH RESPONDENTS : 1 THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, 2 THE DEPUTY SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION (E) DEPARTMENT, 3 THE UNDER SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION (E/J) DEPARTMENT, 4 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, DIRECTORATE OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001.

5 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION KILLIPPALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 695 002. 6 THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 695 101. 7 D. BINIDAS HSA (ENGLISH UNDER DISPUTE), SIVAGIRI HIGH SCHOOL, VARKALA, 8 THE CORPORATE MANAGER SNDS TRUST, SIVAGIRI, VARKALA, BY ADVS. SRI.M.V.THAMBAN SRI.R.REJI SMT.THARA THAMBAN SRI.B.BIPIN SRI.ARUN BOSE S.RAMESH BY JOBY JOSEPH, GOVT.PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.

W.P.(C) No.26814 of 2019 Dated this the 30th day of March, 2022

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner does not intend to pursue the writ petition and a memo to that effect has been filed. Accordingly this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed in terms of the memo. Sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JUDGE RKM

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial