Puttamma vs Smt.Narasamma

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Feb 27, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1553821

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1553821
Court: Karnataka High Court
Judge: Ashok S.Kinagi
Decided On: Feb 27, 2026
Case Number: RSA/1386/2014

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Puttamma

Respondent

Smt.Narasamma

Excerpt

.....court s/o chaluvegowda, of aged about 33 years,karnataka3. kempegowdas/o chaluvegowda, aged about 28 years, since dead rep. by his lrs. 3(a). prema w/o late kempegowda aged about 43 years 3(b). dharshana d.k. -2- s/o late kempegowda aged about 23 years 3(c). anusha d.k. d/o late kempegowda aged about 21 years all are r/at doddagarudanahalli village, basaralu hobli mandya taluk, mandya dist - 571 4164. papa aged about 53 years,5. shankara aged about 41 years,6. naga aged about 33years, all are r/o doddagarudanahalli village, basaralu hobli, mandya taluk, mandya district. pin code:571416. …respondents (by sri. h k kenchegowda., advocate for c/r1 [cp no.369/14], r2 to r6 and p’sd r3[a to c]) this rsa is filed under section. 100 of cpc.,against the judgement & decree dtd 30.6.2014 passed in r.a.no.65/2012 on the file of the ii addl. sr. civil judge, mandya, allowing the appeal and setting aside the judgement and decree dtd 4.8.2012 passed in os.no.318/2005 on the file of the addl. civil judge & jmfc., mandya. this appeal, coming on for hearing, this day,judgment was delivered therein as under:-3- coram: hon'ble mr. justice ashok s.kinagioral judgmentlearned counsel for the appellant filed a memo seeking leave of this court to withdraw the appeal with a liberty to file a comprehensive suit.2. memo is placed on record.3. accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, if law permits.4. the parties are directed to maintain status quo for a period of 4 weeks.5. pending ia(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. sd/- (ashok s.kinagi) judge sks

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1386 OF 2014 (INJ-) BETWEEN: PUTTAMMA W/O KOTEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT HONAGANAHALLI VILLAGE, BASARALU HOBLI, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT. PIN CODE:571416. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SHARATH S GOWDA.,ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SMT.NARASAMMA W/O CHALUVEGOWDA, Digitally signed by AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, SUNITHA K S
Location:     2.     RAVI
HIGH COURT           S/O CHALUVEGOWDA,
OF                   AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
KARNATAKA
3. KEMPEGOWDA

S/O CHALUVEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, SINCE DEAD REP. BY HIS LRS. 3(a). PREMA W/O LATE KEMPEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 3(b). DHARSHANA D.K. -2- S/O LATE KEMPEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS 3(c). ANUSHA D.K. D/O LATE KEMPEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT DODDAGARUDANAHALLI VILLAGE, BASARALU HOBLI MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DIST - 571 416

4. PAPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,

5. SHANKARA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,

6. NAGA AGED ABOUT 33YEARS, ALL ARE R/O DODDAGARUDANAHALLI VILLAGE, BASARALU HOBLI, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT. PIN CODE:571416. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H K KENCHEGOWDA., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 [CP No.369/14], R2 TO R6 AND P’SD R3[a TO c]) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION. 100 OF CPC.,

AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DTD 30.6.2014 PASSED IN R.A.NO.65/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE, MANDYA, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 4.8.2012 PASSED IN OS.NO.318/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC., MANDYA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,

JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

-3- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

ORAL JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo seeking leave of this court to withdraw the appeal with a liberty to file a comprehensive suit.

2. Memo is placed on record.

3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, if law permits.

4. The parties are directed to maintain status quo for a period of 4 weeks.

5. Pending IA(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SKS

Same Court & Year Karnataka · 2026 Same Parties Puttamma vs Smt.Narasamma Same Judge Ashok S.Kinagi