Krishnappa vs Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Feb 02, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1551727

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1551727
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: S Sunil Dutt Yadav
Decided On: Feb 02, 2026
Case Number: WP/15979/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Krishnappa

Respondent

Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board

Excerpt

.....1st floor, nrupatunga road, …respondents(by sri. k. shashikiran sheety, sr. counsel, for sri. p.v. chandrashekar, advocate for r1 and r2; sri. harisha a.s, aga for r3) this wp is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to quash the impugned notice bearing no. kiadb/laq/472/2025-26 dated 06.05.2025 vide annexure-n issued by the r2 and etc., this petition, coming on for orders, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr. justice s sunil dutt yadavoral order1. the present petition has been filed seeking forissuance of writ of certiorari to set-aside the impugned notice at annexure-n. certain other reliefs are also sought for. i.a.no.1/2026 has been filed by respondent nos.1 and 2. para 3 reads as follows; "3. it is submitted that, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the 2nd respondent who has issued the notice dated 06.05.2025 at annexure-n is withdrawing the same. therefore, the above writ petition do not -3- survive for consideration and fresh preliminary notification will be issued in accordance with law."2. in the light of the same, noticing the grievance of the petitioner as regards i.a.no.1/2026 stands redressed. petition is disposed of as not calling for adjudication.3. needless to state that the rights of the state to initiate appropriate action as per law is reserved. sd/- (s sunil dutt yadav) judge gh list no.: 2 sl no.: 69

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 15979 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN:
1. KRISHNAPPA S/O ANJINAPPA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS
2. SHRI. RAJANNA S/O KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT ADINARAYANHOSAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI TALUK, DODDABALLAPURA BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561 203. …PETITIONERS Digitally signed by (BY SMT. SONA VAKKUND, ADVOCATE) VIJAYA P Location: HIGH AND: COURT OF KARNATAKA
1. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL REPRESENTED BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NO. 49, KANIJA BHAVANA, EAST WING, 5TH FLOOR, RACE COURSE ROAD,
2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL -2- REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER -2 KIADB, (BMICP) NO 14/3, CFC BUILDING, MAHARSHI ARAVIND BHAVAN, 1ST FLOOR, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K. SHASHIKIRAN SHEETY, SR. COUNSEL, FOR SRI. P.V. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. HARISHA A.S, AGA FOR R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE BEARING NO. KIADB/LAQ/472/2025-26 DATED 06.05.2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-N ISSUED BY THE R2 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV

ORAL ORDER

1. The present petition has been filed seeking for

issuance of writ of certiorari to set-aside the impugned notice at Annexure-N. Certain other reliefs are also sought for. I.A.No.1/2026 has been filed by respondent Nos.1 and 2. Para 3 reads as follows; "3. It is submitted that, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the 2nd respondent who has issued the notice dated 06.05.2025 at Annexure-N is withdrawing the same. Therefore, the above writ petition do not -3- survive for consideration and fresh preliminary notification will be issued in accordance with law."

2. In the light of the same, noticing the grievance of the petitioner as regards I.A.No.1/2026 stands redressed. Petition is disposed of as not calling for adjudication.

3. Needless to state that the rights of the State to initiate appropriate action as per law is reserved. SD/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE GH List No.: 2 Sl No.: 69

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2026 Same Parties Krishnappa vs Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board Same Judge S Sunil Dutt Yadav