Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sri P Ramadas vs Sri P Balaram

Sri P Ramadas vs Sri P Balaram

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided May 07, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1551052

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RFA/1270/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sri P Ramadas

Respondent

Sri P Balaram

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 7th day of may, 2026 before the hon'ble mr. justice s vishwajith shetty regular first appeal no. 1270 of 2025 (dec/inj) between:1. sri p ramadass/o late p ramaswamy, aged about 61 years, presently r/at no. 855, 4th b cross 5th c block koramangala, bengaluru - 560 034. …appellant (by sri. k narayana., advocate) and:1. sri p balaram aged about 48 years, s/o late sri p ramaswamy, digitallysigned by r/at no. 38, g street, shanthinagar, nandini m bengaluru - 560 027. s …respondent location: (by sri. naveen.n., advocate)high court of karnataka this rfa is filed under section 96 of cpc, against the judgment and decree dated 29.04.2025 passed in os.no.26369/2021 on the file of the lvii additional city civil and sessions judge, mayo hall unit, bengaluru, dismissing the suit for declaration and injunction. this appeal, coming on for orders, this day,judgment was delivered therein as under:-2- coram: hon'ble mr. justice s vishwajith shettyoral judgmentlearned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 07.05.2026 after serving a copy of the same on advocate appearing for respondent. in the memo dated 07.05.2026, it is stated that, the dispute between the parties has been settled out of the court and therefore the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn.2. learned counsel for the appellant submits that the parties are direct brothers and now they have settled the inter se dispute between them. therefore, the appeal may be dismissed.3. the said submission and memo dated 07.05.2026 are taken on record. the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- (s vishwajith shetty) judge nms list no.: 3 sl no.: 3

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF MAY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1270 OF 2025 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN:

1. SRI P RAMADAS

S/O LATE P RAMASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, PRESENTLY R/AT NO. 855, 4TH B CROSS 5TH C BLOCK KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 034. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. K NARAYANA., ADVOCATE) AND:

1. SRI P BALARAM AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O LATE SRI P RAMASWAMY, Digitally

signed by         R/AT NO. 38, G STREET, SHANTHINAGAR,
NANDINI M         BENGALURU - 560 027.
S                                                        …RESPONDENT
Location:   (BY SRI. NAVEEN.N., ADVOCATE)

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.04.2025 PASSED IN OS.NO.26369/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE LVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYO HALL UNIT, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

-2- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

ORAL JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 07.05.2026 after serving a copy of the same on advocate appearing for respondent. In the memo dated 07.05.2026, it is stated that, the dispute between the parties has been settled out of the Court and therefore the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the parties are direct brothers and now they have settled the inter se dispute between them. Therefore, the appeal may be dismissed.

3. The said submission and memo dated 07.05.2026 are taken on record. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE NMS List No.: 3 Sl No.: 3

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial