Selvaraj A Vs The Commissioner

Selvaraj A vs The Commissioner

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 05, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1549926

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1549926
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy
Decided On: Feb 05, 2026
Case Number: WP(MD)/3123/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Selvaraj A

Respondent

The Commissioner

Excerpt

before the madurai bench of madras high court dated :05.02.2026coramthe honourable mr.justice krishnan ramasamy1. selvaraj a,2. kandasamy v ... petitioners vs nungambakkam, chennai - 600 034.. ellis nagar, madurai - 625 001..3. varadharaj p,s/o. late perumal samy, gurumoorthi naykanpatti, aamathur village, virudhunagar taluk, virudhunagar district.. ... respondents prayer :- writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying this court to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the 2nd for petitioners :mr.v.babu for respondent :mr.k.balasubramani for r1 and r2 spl. government pleaderorderthis writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to 2nd2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learnedspecial government pleader appearing for the respondents. since no adverse orders are going to be passed against the third respondent, notice is dispensed with. by consent of both sides, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.3. the petitioners submitted an application under section 64(1) of the hr &ce act. however, no action has been taken on the said application. hence, the present writ petition has been filed.4. learned special government pleader, appearing for the respondents, submits that within three months, the application would be disposed of.5. in view of the above submissions, without expressing anyopinion on the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioners’ application, after giving notice to all the parties, and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. there shall be no order as to costs.ncc :yes/no index :yes/no rr to nungambakkam, chennai - 600 034.. ellis nagar, madurai - 625 001..krishnan ramasamy, j.rr

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :05.02.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

1. Selvaraj A,

2. Kandasamy V ... Petitioners Vs Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034.. Ellis Nagar, Madurai - 625 001..

3. Varadharaj P,

S/o. Late Perumal Samy, Gurumoorthi Naykanpatti, Aamathur Village, Virudhunagar Taluk, Virudhunagar District.. ... Respondents PRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd For Petitioners :Mr.V.Babu For Respondent :Mr.K.Balasubramani for R1 and R2 Spl. Government Pleader

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to 2nd

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned

Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. Since no adverse orders are going to be passed against the third respondent, notice is dispensed with. By consent of both sides, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

3. The petitioners submitted an application under Section 64(1) of the HR &CE Act. However, no action has been taken on the said application. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed.

4. Learned Special Government Pleader, appearing for the respondents, submits that within three months, the application would be disposed of.

5. In view of the above submissions, without expressing any

opinion on the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioners’ application, after giving notice to all the parties, and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No RR To Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034.. Ellis Nagar, Madurai - 625 001..

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties Selvaraj A vs The Commissioner Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy