Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Master Aksh Sinha, vs the Union of India

Master Aksh Sinha, vs The Union of India

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided May 19, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1549523

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/15511/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Master Aksh Sinha,

Respondent

The Union of India

Excerpt

.....chairman3. the chief executive officer central board of secondary education (cbse), cbse integrated office complex, sector-23, phase 1, dwaraka, new delhi-110077. -4-4. the regional officer,central board of secondary education cbse regional office, gnana bharathi main road opp. national law school of india university chandra layout extension, ii stage, bengaluru 560 072. …respondents (by sri. mukund prasad, advocate for r1 ms. ananditha reddy, advocate for r2, r3 and r4) this w.p. is filed under articles 226 & 227 of the constitution of india praying to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the communications dated 05.05.2026, produced at annexure a and 08.05.2026, produced at annexure a, issued by respondent no.4 refusing to permit further fee payment and etc.this petition, coming on for orders, this day, orderwas made therein as under: coram: hon'ble mr. justice c.m. poonachaoral order1. none appears for the petitioners.2. the learned counsel for respondent nos.2, 3 and 4 submits that the relief sought in the writ petition has been rendered infructuous in view of the examination already having taken place on 15.05.2026. -5-3. in view of the aforementioned, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. sd/- (c.m. poonacha) judge nd list no.: 2 sl no.: 41

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF MAY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO. 15511 OF 2026 (EDN-EX) BETWEEN:

1. MASTER AKSH SINHA,

S/O ABHAY KUMAR SINHA RESIDING AT 114, ADITYA VINTAGE, BASAPURA ROAD, HOSA ROAD, ELECTRONIC CITY, BENGALURU 560 100 SINCE MINOR,REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN, FATHER SRI ABHAY KUMAR SINHA

2. KUM. DHANAM INDRA TEJA REDDY, D/O DHAMAM MOHANA REDDY

Digitally        RESIDING AT 15/608 B,
signed by        BHAGAT SINGH NAGAR,
NIRMALA          TADIPATRI, TADIPATRI PO
DEVI             ANANTHAPURAMU,
Location:        ANDHRAPRADESH - 515 411
HIGH             SINCE MINOR, REPRESENTED BY
COURT OF         NATURAL GUARDIAN,
KARNATAKA        FATHER SRI DHAMAM MOHANA REDDY

3. KUM. LAKSHMI V S, D/O S VENKATESH RESIDING AT NO.9, T LAKSHMI LAYOUT, BEHIND SUBRAMNYAPURA POLICE STATION, BANGALORE SOUTH, SUBRAMANYAPURA, BENGALURU 560 061 -2- NATURAL GUARDIAN FATHER SRI S VENKATESH

4. MASTER NARESH THOTA RAJASEKHAR,

S/O T RAJASEKHAR RESIDING AT FLAT NO 4F3, PRAKRUTI ELITE, 4TH FLOOR, SANTOSHI SAGAR ESTATES, 1ST CROSS, CHANNASANDRA, RAJA RAJESHWARI NAGAR, BENGALURU 560 098 SRI T RAJASEKHAR

5. MASTER SKANDA L YADAV, S/O K LOKESH RESIDING AT NO 608, 14TH MAIN, 24TH CROSS, BANASHANKARI 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU SOUTH, BENGALURU 560 070 SRI K LOKESH

6. KUM. R V JOVIKA KAUSHIL, D/O VIKASH KUMAR RESIDING AT NO. A-201 SABIYA, SENARY, CHIKKANAGAMANGALA, SARJAPUR, RAYASANDRA, BENGALURU 560 099 SRI VIKASH KUMAR

7. KUM. RAKSHAA KIRAN, D/O KIRAN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, RESIDING AT 106, 2ND D CROSS, OMBR LAYOUT, NEAR HP PETROL BUNK, -3- CHIKKA BANASAWADI BENGALURU NORTH, KARNATAKA 560043

8. ORCHIDS THE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL

(ALSO REFERRED TO AS GR INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL) KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD, OFF KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD, AGARA VILLAGE, TATAGUNI POST, BENGALURU 560 062. (REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY AND MANAGER SHRI SANJAY L) ALSO RESIDING AT NO 9, R T NAGAR POST OFFICE BENGALURU 560 032 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. AMSHUMAN M, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:

1. THE UNION OF INDIA

REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY) SHASTRI BHAWAN, DR. RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI - 110001

2. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION (CBSE), SHIKSHA KENDRA, 2, COMMUNITY CENTRE, PREET VIHAR, DELHI 110 092. REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN

3. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION (CBSE), CBSE INTEGRATED OFFICE COMPLEX, SECTOR-23, PHASE 1, DWARAKA, NEW DELHI-110077. -4-

4. THE REGIONAL OFFICER,

CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION CBSE REGIONAL OFFICE, GNANA BHARATHI MAIN ROAD OPP. NATIONAL LAW SCHOOL OF INDIA UNIVERSITY CHANDRA LAYOUT EXTENSION, II STAGE, BENGALURU 560 072. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MUKUND PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R1 MS. ANANDITHA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R2, R3 AND R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION QUASHING AND SETTING ASIDE THE COMMUNICATIONS DATED 05.05.2026, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE A AND 08.05.2026, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE A, ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.4 REFUSING TO PERMIT FURTHER FEE PAYMENT AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER

WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA

ORAL ORDER

1. None appears for the petitioners.

2. The learned counsel for respondent Nos.2, 3 and 4 submits that the relief sought in the writ petition has been rendered infructuous in view of the examination already having taken place on 15.05.2026. -5-

3. In view of the aforementioned, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE ND List No.: 2 Sl No.: 41

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial