Mr. Senthil Kumar Vs Parthasarathy

Mr. Senthil Kumar vs Parthasarathy

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 28, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1547994

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1547994
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice K.Murali Shankar
Decided On: Jan 28, 2026
Case Number: SUB A(MD)/40/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mr. Senthil Kumar

Respondent

Parthasarathy

Excerpt

before the madurai bench of madras high court dated : 28.01.2026coramthe honourable mr.justice k.murali shankar in senthil kumar, srirangam police station, social justice and human rights, nagapattinam. : petitioner/3rd respondent (in sub a(md)no.40/2025) sindhunadhi, trichy city. : petitioner/2nd respondent (in sub a(md)no.41/2025) vs. 1.parthasarathy 2.periyasamy, trichy city. : respondents (in both petitions) 3.sindhunadhi, (in sub a (md)no.40/2025) 4.senthil kumar, g.h.police station, (in sub a (md)no.41/2025) prayer : these sub applications are filed under section 151 of cpc, to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioners before this court on 28.01.2026 in the above contempt petition. for petitioners : mr.s.ramsundarvijayraj, (in sub a(md)no.40 of 2026) : mr.r.aravindan, (in sub a(md)no.41 of 2026) for respondents : mr.m.marimuthu, for r1. (in both petitions)common orderwhen the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/respondents 2 and 3 would submit that due to the visit of the chief minister and governor of tamil nadu, both were deputed for the escort duty and that they have already filed an applications to dispense with their personal appearance. 2.considering the reasons assigned, these petitions are ordered. the personal appearance of the petitioners are dispensed with for the present hearing. das (1/2)k.murali shankar,j.das in (1/2)

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.01.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR in Senthil Kumar, Srirangam Police Station, Social Justice and Human Rights, Nagapattinam. : Petitioner/3rd Respondent (in Sub A(MD)No.40/2025) Sindhunadhi, Trichy City. : Petitioner/2nd Respondent (in Sub A(MD)No.41/2025) Vs. 1.Parthasarathy 2.Periyasamy, Trichy City. : Respondents (in both petitions) 3.Sindhunadhi, (in Sub A (MD)No.40/2025) 4.Senthil Kumar, G.H.Police Station, (in Sub A (MD)No.41/2025) Prayer : These sub Applications are filed under Section 151 of CPC, to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioners before this Court on 28.01.2026 in the above contempt petition. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Ramsundarvijayraj, (in Sub A(MD)No.40 of 2026) : Mr.R.Aravindan, (in Sub A(MD)No.41 of 2026) For Respondents : Mr.M.Marimuthu, for R1. (in both petitions)

COMMON ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/respondents 2 and 3 would submit that due to the visit of the Chief Minister and Governor of Tamil Nadu, both were deputed for the escort duty and that they have already filed an applications to dispense with their personal appearance. 2.Considering the reasons assigned, these petitions are ordered. The personal appearance of the petitioners are dispensed with for the present hearing. das (1/2)

K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.

das in (1/2)

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Mr. Senthil Kumar vs Parthasarathy Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice K.Murali Shankar