Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jihad.B vs State of Kerala

Jihad.B vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Nov 28, 2022
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1547563

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./7841/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jihad.B

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....of incorporation issued by the ministry of corporate affairs. although the petitioner moved an application for anticipatory bail before the sessions court, the same was rejected by annexure a4.5. the learned public prosecutor seriously opposed theapplication for bail mainly contending huge quantity of synthetic drug is involved and when the 1st accused was interrogated, he gave a statement that the narcotic drug was sold to him by the petitioner herein. when the mobile phone of the 1st accused was examined, constant contact was revealed between the 1 st accused and the petitioner herein. the learned public prosecutor further submitted that petitioner is involved in two other cases of a similar nature.6. considering the facts and circumstances of the case, i am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. it is for the petitioner to surrender and seek for bail. bail appln. no. 7841 of 2022 4 therefore the above bail application is dismissed.accordingly the petitioner shall surrender before the investigating officer in crime no. 677/2022 of kilikolloor police station and subject himself for interrogation. in the event of arrest of the petitioner in crime no. 677/2022 of kilikolloor police station, he shall be produced before the jurisdictional magistrate on the very same day. if an application is moved with prior notice to the learned public prosecutor, the same shall be considered and disposed by the jurisdictional magistrate preferebly on the same day.sd/- viju abraham judge sbk/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 7TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944 BAIL APPL. NO. 7841 OF 2022 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENTCRMC 1783/2022 OF DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT,KOLLAM

PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2: JIHAD.B AGED 32 YEARS AMINA MANZIL, SANTHI NAGAR-05, AYATHIL PO, PATTATHANAM, KOLLAM., PIN - 691021 BY ADVS. C.R.JAYAKUMAR NOBEL RAJU RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER KILIKOLLOOR STATION, KOLLAM., PIN - 691004 BY SRI.M.C.ASHI (PP) THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Bail Appln. No. 7841 of 2022 2

VIJU ABRAHAM , J.

=========================== Bail Appln. No. 7841 of 2022 ============================ Dated this the 28th day of November, 2022

ORDER

This is an application for anticipatory bail.

2. Petitioner is the 2nd accused in Crime No. 677/2022 of

Kilikolloor Police Station, Kollam District alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 22(b), 20(b)IIA, 25 and 29 of Narcotic Drugs and Pshychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

3. The prosecution allegation is that, on 9/7/2022 at about

12 noon; acting on a tip-off when the Sub Inspector of Police, Kilikolloor Police Station reached at the residential premises of 1 st accused situated at Randamkutty, 1st accused was found in possession of 4.75 grams of MDMA and 2.870 grams of ganja and an amount of 99,000/- which was the sale proceeds of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substance was also seized from the accused. Electronic weighing machine and packing materials were seized from the Honda City Car bearing Reg. No. KL-02/AW- 5946 parked in the premises. According to the prosecution; on interrogation of 1st accused, it was revealed that it was the petitioner who had entrusted the contraband to the 1 st accused

Bail Appln. No. 7841 of 2022 3 for the purpose of sale and thereby the accused have committed the alleged offences.

4. The petitioner submitted that he has been falsely implicated in the above said crime. The petitioner is a business man and is one of the directors of M/s Inoki Ventures Pvt Ltd,

Ernakulam which is engaged in IT related business. To substantiate the same, petitioner has produced Annexure A2 Certificate of Incorporation issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs. Although the petitioner moved an application for anticipatory bail before the Sessions Court, the same was rejected by Annexure A4.

5. The learned Public Prosecutor seriously opposed the

application for bail mainly contending huge quantity of synthetic drug is involved and when the 1st accused was interrogated, he gave a statement that the narcotic drug was sold to him by the petitioner herein. When the mobile phone of the 1st accused was examined, constant contact was revealed between the 1 st accused and the petitioner herein. The learned Public Prosecutor further submitted that petitioner is involved in two other cases of a similar nature.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. It is for the petitioner to surrender and seek for bail. Bail Appln. No. 7841 of 2022 4 Therefore the above bail application is dismissed.

Accordingly the petitioner shall surrender before the investigating officer in Crime No. 677/2022 of Kilikolloor Police Station and subject himself for interrogation. In the event of arrest of the petitioner in Crime No. 677/2022 of Kilikolloor Police Station, he shall be produced before the Jurisdictional Magistrate on the very same day. If an application is moved with prior notice to the learned Public Prosecutor, the same shall be considered and disposed by the Jurisdictional Magistrate preferebly on the same day.

Sd/- VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE sbk/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial