Vijith Kumar vs Moulya C

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jun 19, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1546941

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1546941
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: Ravi V Hosmani
Decided On: Jun 19, 2026
Case Number: CRL.P/7423/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vijith Kumar

Respondent

Moulya C

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 19th day of june, 2026 before the hon'ble mr. justice ravi v hosmani criminal petition no. 7423 of 2019 between: vijith kumar s/o mahabala suvarna aged 32 years, r/o no.72, 2nd cross 4th main, bharath nagar m.s. palya, vidyaranyapura post bengaluru - 560 097. …petitioner (by sri. shivaprasad t, advocate for sri. shetty deepak, advocate) and: digitally signed 1. moulya c by sharadavani d/o c.s. balaraju b location: high aged 32 years, court of karnataka r/o no. 22, 5th cross, pillegowda layout2. c.s balaraju s/o c. sitaram aged 52 years, r/o no. 22, 5th cross pillegouwda layout -2-3. state of karnataka represented by vidyaranyapura p.s., through public prosecutor, hon'ble high court of karnataka bengaluru. …respondents (by sri. channappa erappa, hcgp for r3; r1 and r2 - served) this crl.p is filed u/s 482 of cr.p.c. praying toquash the entire proceedings in c.c.no.22203/2014 pending before the iv addl.c.m.m., bengaluru filed by the 1st respondent against the petitioner herein as accused no.1 for the alleged offence p/u/s 354, 509, 504 r/w 39 of ipc, this criminal petition with cost throughout. this petition, coming on for orders, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr. justice ravi v hosmanioral orderlearned counsel for petitioner appears through video conference and submits that during pendency of above petition, matter had progressed before trial court and charges are framed and submits that reserving liberty to urge all -3- contentions urged herein before trial court at appropriate stage petition may be disposed of.2. noting submission, petition is disposed of. consequently, pending applications are dismissed as unnecessary. sd/- (ravi v hosmani) judge hnm list no.: 1 sl no.: 4

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7423 OF 2019 BETWEEN: VIJITH KUMAR S/O MAHABALA SUVARNA AGED 32 YEARS, R/O NO.72, 2ND CROSS 4TH MAIN, BHARATH NAGAR M.S. PALYA, VIDYARANYAPURA POST BENGALURU - 560 097. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVAPRASAD T, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SHETTY DEEPAK, ADVOCATE) AND: Digitally signed 1. MOULYA C by SHARADAVANI D/O C.S. BALARAJU B Location: High AGED 32 YEARS, Court of Karnataka R/O NO. 22, 5TH CROSS, PILLEGOWDA LAYOUT
2. C.S BALARAJU S/O C. SITARAM AGED 52 YEARS, R/O NO. 22, 5TH CROSS PILLEGOUWDA LAYOUT -2-
3. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY VIDYARANYAPURA P.S., THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. CHANNAPPA ERAPPA, HCGP FOR R3; R1 AND R2 - SERVED) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.22203/2014 PENDING BEFORE THE IV ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT AGAINST THE PETITIONER HEREIN AS ACCUSED NO.1 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 354, 509, 504 R/W 39 OF IPC, THIS CRIMINAL PETITION WITH COST THROUGHOUT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI

ORAL ORDER

Learned counsel for petitioner appears through Video Conference and submits that during pendency of above petition, matter had progressed before trial Court and charges are framed and submits that reserving liberty to urge all -3- contentions urged herein before trial Court at appropriate stage petition may be disposed of.

2. Noting submission, Petition is disposed of. Consequently, pending applications are dismissed as unnecessary. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2026 Same Parties Vijith Kumar vs Moulya C Same Judge Ravi V Hosmani