Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Smt Saroja vs the Manager

Smt Saroja vs The Manager

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Jun 24, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1546505

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RP/286/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Smt Saroja

Respondent

The Manager

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 24th day of june, 2026 before the hon'ble mr. justice e.s.indiresh review petition no. 286 of 2023 between:1. smt saroja c/o late byrappa aged about 52 years.2. sri praveen kumar b aged about 31 years.3. sri prashanth kumar b aged about 29 years all are r/at 6th main, 3rdcross swamy vivekananda layout shimoga-577 201. …petitioners (by smt. chanchala n d., advocate)digitally signed by dhanalakshmi murthy and: location: high courtof 1. the manager karnataka the karnataka co-operative milk producers federation limited central office, bengaluru-560 029.2. the managing directormachena halli, nidige post shimogga co-operative milk produces societies union ltd. shimogga-577 222 …respondents (by sri. dayanand s patil., advocate for r2 r1 is served) -2- this review petition is filed under order 47 rule 1 of cpc, praying to call for the entire records pertaining to the file in w.p. no.1833/2023 passed by this hon’ble court and after perusing the records,this hon’ble court be pleased to review the orderdated 24.05.2023, passed by this hon’ble court in w.p. no. 1833/2023, which is produced annexure-a and etc. this petition, coming on for admission, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr. justice e.s.indireshoral order1. learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 24.06.2026 seeking leave of this court to withdraw the review petition.2. memo is taken on record.3. accordingly, the review petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- (e.s.indiresh) judge ha list no.: 1 sl no.: 45

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REVIEW PETITION NO. 286 OF 2023 BETWEEN:

1. SMT SAROJA C/O LATE BYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS.

2. SRI PRAVEEN KUMAR B AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS.

3. SRI PRASHANTH KUMAR B AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT 6TH MAIN, 3RDCROSS SWAMY VIVEKANANDA LAYOUT SHIMOGA-577 201. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. CHANCHALA N D., ADVOCATE)

Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY AND: Location: HIGH COURTOF 1. THE MANAGER KARNATAKA THE KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS FEDERATION LIMITED CENTRAL OFFICE, BENGALURU-560 029.

2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

MACHENA HALLI, NIDIGE POST SHIMOGGA CO-OPERATIVE MILK PRODUCES SOCIETIES UNION LTD. SHIMOGGA-577 222 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. DAYANAND S PATIL., ADVOCATE FOR R2 R1 IS SERVED) -2- THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO THE FILE IN W.P. NO.1833/2023 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT AND AFTER PERUSING THE RECORDS,

THIS HON’BLE COURT BE PLEASED TO REVIEW THE ORDER

DATED 24.05.2023, PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN W.P. NO. 1833/2023, WHICH IS PRODUCED ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

ORAL ORDER

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 24.06.2026 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the review petition.

2. Memo is taken on record.

3. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE HA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 45

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial