Ananda Kumar M B vs the Tahsildar

Ananda Kumar M B vs The Tahsildar

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jun 24, 2026

~4 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1546313

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1546313
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: E.S.Indiresh
Decided On: Jun 24, 2026
Case Number: WP/15502/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ananda Kumar M B

Respondent

The Tahsildar

Excerpt

.....r-1 to r-4) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227of the constitution of india praying to direct the respondent no.4 not to disburse the award amount with respect to sy.no.97 measuring to an extent of 3 acres 21 guntas, sy.no.101 measuring to an extent of 4 acres 34 guntas, sy.no.105 measuring to an extent of 3 acres 29 guntas, sy.no.95 measuring to an extent of 1 acre 30 guntas, sy.no.104 measuring to an extent of 3 acres 21 guntas, all the said lands situated at machanahalli village, sompura hobli, nelamangala taluk in favour of respondents no.8 to 41 who are no way concerned to the said lands vide no. ci 134 spq(e) 2022dated 12.07.2022 as per annexure-q and etc.this petition coming on for orders, this day, orderwas made therein as under: -9- coram: hon'ble mrs. justice k.s. hemalekhaoral orderthis court, on 15.09.2025, passed the followingorder:“ten days time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the petition stands dismissed for its non prosecution. in the event they stand complied as on today, those matters shall be listed on the ensuing days of the respective matters being given.”2. the petitioner has not complied with the orderdated 15.09.2025 nor has he complied with the office objections till today.3. in view of the above, this court has no otheroption than to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. sd/- ______________________ justice k.s. hemalekha mbm list no.: 1 sl no.: 76

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO.15502 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: ANANDA KUMAR M.B. S/O LATE BYLAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, …PETITIONER (BY SRI MANJUNATHA V., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE TAHSILDAR TALUK PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SUBHASHANAGAR, NELAMANGALA, Digitally signed by BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. MAHALAKSHMI B M
Location: HIGH        2.   THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
COURT OF                   DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION,
KARNATAKA                  DODDABALLAPURA,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPURA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
4. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-II #14/3, 1ST FLOOR, MAHARSHI ARAVIND BHAVAN, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, SAMPANGI RAMA NAGAR, BENGALURU-560009. -2-
5. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD REPRESENTED BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, #49, 4TH & 5TH FLOORS, ‘EAST WING’, KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU-560001.
6. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, #49, 4TH & 5TH FLOORS, ‘EAST WING’, KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU-560001.
7. HINDU RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS AND CHARITABLE ENOWMENT DEPARTMENT REP. BY COMMISSIONER, 4TH FLOOR, SRI MINTO ANJENEYA SWAMY BHAVAN, AALUR VENAKTRAM ROAD, CHAMARAJPET, BANGALORE-560018.
8. SMT. SAVITHRAMMA W/O B. RAMAKRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS,
9. SRI BYREGOWDA S/O B. RAMAKRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
10. SRI JAGADEESH M.R. S/O B. RAMAKRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, -3-
11. SRI GANGEGOWDA S/O BYRE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,
12. SRI SUNANDAMMA W/O LATE RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
13. SMT. MAHIMANNA S/O MUDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS,
14. SRI LAKSHMAMMA W/O BYREGOWDA M.G. AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
15. SRI GANGADARAIAH AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
16. SRI MOORTHY G. AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, -4-
17. SRI MUDDAIAH .G AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
18. SRI GANGAIAH .G AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
19. SRI RAMESH .G AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
20. SRI NAGESH .G AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
21. SRI HNUMAIAH .G S/O LATE GANGABYRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, -5-
22. SRI MUDDAIAH S/O LATE ANDANIAH, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,
23. SRI NARASAMMA S/O BYREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
24. SRI KIRAN KUMAR S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
25. SMT. MANGALAGOWRI D/O LATE GANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
26. SRI GOVINDARAJU M.R. S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
27. SMT. LAKSHMI DEVI D/O LATE GANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, -6-
28. SMT. JYOTHI LAKSHMI D/O LATE GANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
29. SMT. SUJATHA D/O LATE GANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
30. SRI HANUMANTHAIAH S/O MUDDEERAIAH, AGED ABOUT YEARS,
31. SRI KADARAIAH S/O LATE HUCHANARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT YEARS,
32. SRI K.B. RAMACHANDRA S/O LATE BYLAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
33. SRI VIJAYAKUMAR S/O HANUMANTHARAYAPPA, -7- AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
34. SRI MAHIMADASAPPA S/O LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
35. SRI KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
36. JAKIRA S/O CHAND PASHA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
37. SRI SIDDARAMAIAH S/O MUDDE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
38. SRI T. PRAKASH S/O LATE THIRUMALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, -8-
39. SRI RANGASWAMY S/O LATE THIRUMALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
40. SRI MAHIMAIAH S/O LATE THIRUMALAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
41. SRI VASANTH KUMAR
S/O LATE LINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, RESIDING AT SHIVAGANGE VILLAGE, …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI HARISHA A.S, AGA FOR R-1 TO R-4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.4 NOT TO DISBURSE THE AWARD AMOUNT WITH RESPECT TO SY.NO.97 MEASURING TO AN EXTENT OF 3 ACRES 21 GUNTAS, SY.NO.101 MEASURING TO AN EXTENT OF 4 ACRES 34 GUNTAS, SY.NO.105 MEASURING TO AN EXTENT OF 3 ACRES 29 GUNTAS, SY.NO.95 MEASURING TO AN EXTENT OF 1 ACRE 30 GUNTAS, SY.NO.104 MEASURING TO AN EXTENT OF 3 ACRES 21 GUNTAS, ALL THE SAID LANDS SITUATED AT MACHANAHALLI VILLAGE, SOMPURA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK IN FAVOUR OF RESPONDENTS NO.8 TO 41 WHO ARE NO WAY CONCERNED TO THE SAID LANDS VIDE NO. CI 134 SPQ(E) 2022DATED 12.07.2022 AS PER ANNEXURE-Q AND ETC.

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER

WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: -9- CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA

ORAL ORDER

This Court, on 15.09.2025, passed the following

order:

“Ten days time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the petition stands dismissed for its non prosecution. In the event they stand complied as on today, those matters shall be listed on the ensuing days of the respective matters being given.”

2. The petitioner has not complied with the order

dated 15.09.2025 nor has he complied with the office objections till today.

3. In view of the above, this Court has no other

option than to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- ______________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA MBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 76

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2026 Same Parties Ananda Kumar M B vs The Tahsildar Same Judge E.S.Indiresh