Natesh vs Gowramma

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jun 23, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1540054

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1540054
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: Jayant Banerji,Tara Vitasta Ganju
Decided On: Jun 23, 2026
Case Number: MFA/3890/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Natesh

Respondent

Gowramma

Excerpt

.....of mv act, against thejudgment and award dt.30.01.2020 passed in mvcno.639/2019 on the file of the iii additional district judge, mact, mysuru, partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation. this appeal, coming on for orders, this day,judgment was delivered therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr. justice jayant banerji &hon'ble ms. justice tara vitasta ganjuoral judgment(per: hon'ble mr. justice jayant banerji) despite the matter being called twice, no one appears for the appellant. when the matter was last listed on 04.06.2026, the following order was passed:“learned counsel for the appellant prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file duly attested translated copies of the documents/depositions on record supported by an affidavit as required under order xiii rule 12 of cpc (karnataka amendment) failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the court. if the translations are filed, list on 23.06.2026.”2. the office report is that the affidavit (as requiredby order dated 04.06.2026) is yet to be filed. moreover, we note from the trial court record that though various depositions require translation, however the translated -3- deposition of only pw-2 has been filed. therefore, we dismiss this appeal for non-prosecution. (jayant banerji) (tara vitasta ganju) ks list no.: 1 sl no.: 2

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3890 OF 2020(MV-I) BETWEEN: NATESH S/O RAMA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, R/AT HARAVE VILLAGE AND POST, GAVADAGERE HOBLI, HUNSUR TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SYED ABDUL SABOOR., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND:
1. GOWRAMMA

W/O DODDARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT KODIYALA VILLAGE, MIRLE HOBLI, K.R.NAGARA TQ., Digitally signed by SUMATHY KANNAN Location: HIGH 2. M/S NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., COURT OF KARNTAKA THE MANAGER DIVISIONAL OFFICE, NATIONAL INSURANCE CO., CH 8/1, KANTHARAJA URS ROAD, LAKSHMIPURA, MYSURU-570 009. …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. B.C.SEETHARAM RAO., ADVOCATE FOR R2 [ABSENT]; V/O/DTD:16.01.2021, NOTICE TO R1 IS DISPENSED WITH) -2- THIS MFA FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE

JUDGMENT AND AWARD DT.30.01.2020 PASSED IN MVC

NO.639/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MACT, MYSURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI &

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI) Despite the matter being called twice, no one appears for the appellant. When the matter was last listed on 04.06.2026, the following order was passed:

“Learned Counsel for the appellant prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file duly attested translated copies of the documents/depositions on record supported by an affidavit as required under Order XIII Rule 12 of CPC (Karnataka Amendment) failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. If the translations are filed, list on 23.06.2026.”

2. The office report is that the affidavit (as required

by order dated 04.06.2026) is yet to be filed. Moreover, we note from the Trial Court Record that though various depositions require translation, however the translated -3- deposition of only PW-2 has been filed. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for non-prosecution. (JAYANT BANERJI) (TARA VITASTA GANJU) KS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2026 Same Parties Natesh vs Gowramma Same Judge Jayant Banerji,Tara Vitasta Ganju