Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vsc Hollow Blocks & Crusher Division vs Pallichal Grama Panchayat

Vsc Hollow Blocks & Crusher Division vs Pallichal Grama Panchayat

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 01, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1536724

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/15003/2016

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vsc Hollow Blocks & Crusher Division

Respondent

Pallichal Grama Panchayat

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice shaji p.chaly friday, the 1st day of july 2022 / 10th ashadha, 1944 petitioner: vsc hollow blocks & crusher division, nemom po, thiruvananthapuram, representd by its managing partner, v.sudhakaran. by advs.sri.enoch david simon joel respondents: 1 pallichal grama panchayat, vedivachankovil po, balaramapuram, thiruvananthapuram 695 501, represented by its secretary. 2 secretary pallichal grama panchayat vedivachankovil po, balaramapuram, thiruvananthapruam 695 501. by adv sri.t.k.ananda krishnan this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 01.07.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following: :: 2 ::judgmentdated this the 1st day of july 2022 this writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs: i. issue a writ in the nature of a declaration, declaring that petitioner has a deemed license under section 236(3) of panchayat raj act.ii. issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, orderor direction directing the 2nd respondent to issue formal renewal of license to the petitioner for conducting the unit as applied for vide ext.p2 and p3 applications for the period 2016-17.iii. issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, orderor direction directing the respondents not to interfere with the functioning of the unit being conducted by the petitioner, on the strength of the deemed license.iv. issue a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ, orderor direction quashing exts.p4 and p4(a).2. on this day, when the matter is taken up for consideration,adv.cinil representing learned counsel for the petitioner sri.enoch david simon joel submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. sd/- shaji p. chaly judge jes

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JULY 2022 / 10TH ASHADHA, 1944 PETITIONER: VSC HOLLOW BLOCKS & CRUSHER DIVISION, NEMOM PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTD BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, V.SUDHAKARAN. BY ADVS.SRI.ENOCH DAVID SIMON JOEL RESPONDENTS: 1 PALLICHAL GRAMA PANCHAYAT, VEDIVACHANKOVIL PO, BALARAMAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 501, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2 SECRETARY PALLICHAL GRAMA PANCHAYAT VEDIVACHANKOVIL PO, BALARAMAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPRUAM 695 501. BY ADV SRI.T.K.ANANDA KRISHNAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.07.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: :: 2 ::

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 1st day of July 2022 This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs: i. issue a writ in the nature of a declaration, declaring that petitioner has a deemed license under Section 236(3) of Panchayat Raj Act.

ii. issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order

or direction directing the 2nd respondent to issue formal renewal of license to the petitioner for conducting the unit as applied for vide Ext.P2 and P3 applications for the period 2016-17.

iii. Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order

or direction directing the respondents not to interfere with the functioning of the unit being conducted by the petitioner, on the strength of the deemed license.

iv. issue a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ, order

or direction quashing Exts.P4 and P4(a).

2. On this day, when the matter is taken up for consideration,

Adv.Cinil representing learned counsel for the petitioner Sri.Enoch David Simon Joel submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. SD/- SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE jes

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial