Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

S.Sathya Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Principal Secretary

S.Sathya vs The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Principal Secretary

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 02, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1532313

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(MD)/1803/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S.Sathya

Respondent

The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Principal Secretary

Excerpt

before the madurai bench of madras high court dated : 02.02.2026coram :the hon`ble mr.justice b.pugalendhi s.sathya ... petitioner vs. 1.the state of tamil nadu, represented by its principal secretary, 359 anna salai teynampet 4.the tamil nadu nurses and midwives council rep by its registrar jeyaprakash narayanam maligai old no.140 new no.56 santhome high road (near santhome church) mylapore chennai 600 004. ... respondentsprayer : writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying for the issuance of writ of mandamus, to direct directing the respondent no.3 consider the petitioners representation dated on 06.01.2026 in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this court. for petitioner : mr.r.rajaselvan for r1 & r2 : mr.c.venkatesh kumar, special government pleader. for r3 : mrs.r.yasmin begum, standing counsel.orderthe petitioner has applied for the post of auxiliary nurse midwife/village health nurse as per the notification issued by the third respondent dated 11.10.2023. the petitioner with a grievance that she has not been selected for the post as per the said notification, has submitted a representation and has filed this writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to consider her representation.2.the learned standing counsel appearing for the third respondent submits that by a proceedings dated 31.01.2026, the representation of the petitioner has been rejected that she is not qualified as per the notification dated 11.10.2023. the copy of the rejection order has also been furnished to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 3.recording the above submission and the proceedings dated 31.01.2026, this writ petition is closed with a liberty to the petitioner to workout her remedy in the manner known to law. there shall be noorder as to costs.ncc : yes/no index : yes/no internet:yes gns to 1.the principal secretary, 359 anna salai teynampet b.pugalendhi,j gns

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.02.2026

CORAM :

THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI S.Sathya ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Principal Secretary, 359 Anna Salai Teynampet 4.The Tamil Nadu Nurses and Midwives Council Rep by its Registrar Jeyaprakash Narayanam Maligai Old No.140 New No.56 Santhome High Road (Near Santhome Church) Mylapore Chennai 600 004. ... Respondents

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct directing the Respondent No.3 consider the Petitioners representation dated on 06.01.2026 in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Rajaselvan For R1 & R2 : Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar, Special Government Pleader. For R3 : Mrs.R.Yasmin Begum, Standing Counsel.

ORDER

The petitioner has applied for the post of Auxiliary Nurse Midwife/Village Health Nurse as per the notification issued by the third respondent dated 11.10.2023. The petitioner with a grievance that she has not been selected for the post as per the said notification, has submitted a representation and has filed this writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to consider her representation.

2.The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the third respondent submits that by a proceedings dated 31.01.2026, the representation of the petitioner has been rejected that she is not qualified as per the notification dated 11.10.2023. The copy of the rejection order has also been furnished to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 3.Recording the above submission and the proceedings dated 31.01.2026, this writ petition is closed with a liberty to the petitioner to workout her remedy in the manner known to law. There shall be no

order as to costs.

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes gns To 1.The Principal Secretary, 359 Anna Salai Teynampet B.PUGALENDHI,J gns

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties S.Sathya vs The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Princi... Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales